Facing no clear consensus on a long-term farm bill, or even a one-year extension, House Republicans today pushed a stand-alone drought assistance measure, fearing Members otherwise would leave for August recess without any action to take home to struggling farmers and ranchers.
Leadership had been scrambling to approve an unpopular one-year reauthorization of farm programs that Senate Democrats already said would be dead on arrival. And with an astounding 80 percent of the contiguous United States currently under drought conditions — according to the National Drought Mitigation Center — top GOP sources expressed serious concern about the optics of doing nothing to aid farmers at the height of summer.
In a private, closed-door meeting in Speaker John Boehner’s office late this afternoon, leaders decided they could gin up enough votes to proceed with extending emergency benefits to farmers in duress. But they did not rule out having to twist GOP arms or appeal for Democrats’ support.
“What was clear was that we can’t send our Members home in the middle of a drought without any action,” one House GOP leadership aide said before the session. The source indicated that the House would attempt to vote on the supplemental agricultural-disaster-only package by Wednesday or Thursday.
What was not immediately clear, however, was the exact shape of the House drought aid package. The details of the bill will be crucial in determining whether Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), armed with a broad bipartisan five-year farm bill, will bring up the House bill for a vote this week.
“We have a very good farm bill that includes drought relief that is very significant,” Reid said in his weekly media availability with reporters. “I think what the House should do is take these provisions we have in the bill we sent them, and if they want to do something about drought relief, send that to us.”
“We’re willing to do anything that’s reasonable, but an extension some of them are talking about is not reasonable,” Reid added, summarily rejecting the one-year farm bill extension plan the House Rules Committee decided to scrap later in the day.
Leaving the door open to moving the separate disaster piece of the farm bill was a significant move for Reid, especially given that many of his rank-and-file Members believe they should settle for nothing short of the full, five-year extension they passed with 64 votes in June.
Democrats have long believed they have the leverage in the farm bill debate, not only because of the 16 Senate Republicans who voted for it, but also because the package they approved would reduce the deficit by about $24 billion over 10 years, end direct farm subsidies and cut food stamps by $4 billion.
As late as this afternoon, Democrats were clearly divided on how to proceed if the House presents a disaster-only bill. Senate Agriculture Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow (Mich.) was set on continuing the push for a full bill and not approving a pared-down measure, according to Senate sources.
“We’ve got a five-year farm bill, we ought to have a five-year farm bill,” Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) said, insisting he would not support a piecemeal approach.