Dec. 20, 2014 SIGN IN | REGISTER
Download CQ Roll Call's Definitive Guide to the 114th Congress | Sign Up for Roll Call Newsletters | Get the Latest on the Roll Call App

Do Democrats Face More Trouble From Occupy Wall Street?

Chris Maddaloni/CQ Roll Call File Photo

Its hard to say exactly when the Occupy Wall Street movement fizzled, but so far it has failed to become the politically potent force that the tea party was during the 2010 election cycle.

But even if the Occupy movement has not yet broadened its appeal or redefined our politics, it could still be a factor in 2012. The question, of course, is what kind of factor?

Occupy Wall Street has not established itself as a working-class or middle-class political movement of average Americans frustrated by governments failures. Still largely decentralized, without financial muscle and not yet focused on campaigns or eolections, it isnt even a pale reflection of the tea party last cycle.

The tea party in 2010 was a political movement; it was Republicanism on steroids. Occupy Wall Street, on the other hand, isnt a political movement. Its a symptom of all the angst that middle-class Americans feel, one Democratic strategist argued recently.

And yet, polls show that Americans have very similar indeed, almost identical reactions to both movements.

An Oct. 31 through Nov. 3 Washington Post/ABC News poll found that 43 percent of Americans support the tea party movement while 44 percent oppose it. At the same time, 44 percent said they support Occupy Wall Street and 41 percent oppose it.

At this point, it seems unlikely that the Occupy movement will ever have the clout that tea party groups achieved. Unlike the tea party, which succeeded in presenting itself as a movement of angry taxpayers, senior citizens and middle-class Americans, the Occupy movement has not evolved beyond its leftist roots.

Just take a look at the symbols and rhetoric of the movement. Words and phrases such as oppression, the crimes of Wall Street, social injustice, solidarity forever, corporate manipulation of the agriculture system and the fight to reclaim democracy from the banks are used the way they were by protesters in the 1960s. Hunger strikes and protest marches are back, and the clenched fist is the image of the movement, again echoing the 1960s.

Of course, it isnt surprising that a movement relying primarily on college students and professors, anti-globalization activists, anarchists, professional protesters and a very small slice of organized labor hasnt become a potent electoral force.

While Republicans can breathe a sigh of relief that the Occupy movement has not succeeded in appealing to working-class and middle-class swing voters, savvy GOP strategists understand that those same politically important voters are worried about some of the concerns raised by the Occupy movement the economy, the lack of jobs, the seeming excesses of Wall Street and their own feelings of powerlessness.

Economic populism is still an effective weapon for the White House and Congressional Democrats, and Republicans may well play into Democrats hands if the GOP handles issues such as the extension of the payroll tax cut and unemployment insurance ineptly, as it has done so far.

comments powered by Disqus

SIGN IN




OR

SUBSCRIBE

Want Roll Call on your doorstep?