When I was a young boy growing up in New York, the United Nations headquarters on the East Side was on my top-10 list of must-sees for relatives visiting the city. The idea that there was this place that worked to promote peace and justice seemed too cool to pass up. Even now, some 40 years later, I can still remember getting chills while standing at the back of the General Assembly.
When UNESCO hired me four years ago, I had to pinch myself. I was going to work for the U.N., but not just any part of the U.N. It was the agency that is the embodiment of the highest principles espoused by the U.N. system and by most Americans as well. Whatís not to like about peace, justice, freedom of expression, preserving cultural heritage, education for all and access to scientific knowledge?
Fast-forward four years and I am bearing witness to a chain of events that threatens UNESCO and, by extension, American influence abroad. When the 193 nations that form UNESCOís governing body voted to admit Palestine as a member state in October, the United States was obligated by law to cut off all funding to the organization.
This isnít chump change for UNESCO. The U.S. contributes 22 percent of the annual budget, or about $80 million a year.
But it is far less than the most conservative estimates for daily spending in Iraq in the months following the fall of Baghdad, which is where I worked until this fall. Two years after joining UNESCO, I volunteered to go to Iraq to be the officer in charge of the Baghdad office.
In the two years that I lived and worked in the Iraqi capital, I supported, promoted and managed a variety of programs that changed the lives of Iraqis for the better. They ranged from providing literacy and vocational education training to projects combating drought and others promoting freedom of expression and freedom of the press. All of this is now in jeopardy. U.S. funding for UNESCO directly or indirectly supports programs in Iraq that no American would find out of line with our own values and the aspirations that we would have for the Iraqi people.
And yet the cut in U.S. funds to UNESCO cuts us off from the Iraqis and from helping them to develop the democratic institutions that they need in order to emerge from years of dictatorship and war. An Iraq at peace with itself and with its neighbors is in our national interest.
As the last American soldiers prepare to leave Iraq, a U.S.-funded project to strengthen the judiciary and build the skills of reporters to report on the courts was eliminated because of a 21-year-old law that has outlived its usefulness.
A major conference on freedom of expression, right to information and Internet governance will likely not happen because the United States can no longer contribute to UNESCO.
Most Iraqis will tell you that they want to be part of the solution. They want their government to be accountable, and in that accountability, they expect basic services to be provided. They want their voices to be heard. They want a better life for their children. They want access to information that empowers them to chart a course for the future that will bring peace and prosperity.
Rep. Bill Cassidy has his blood drawn by Alesha Barbour during a free hepatitis screening in the Rayburn House Office Building hosted by the Congressional Viral Hepatitis Caucus to recognize "National Viral Hepatitis Testing Day."
Roll Call has launched a new feature, Hill Navigator, to advise congressional staffers and would-be staffers on how to manage workplace issues on Capitol Hill. Please send us your questions anything from office etiquette, to handling awkward moments, to what happens when the work life gets too personal. Submissions will be treated anonymously.