Feb. 7, 2016 SIGN IN | REGISTER

Ethics May Extend Waters Case Into Next Year

Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call File Photo

The House Ethics Committee on Wednesday indicated that it may need to extend the contract of the independent counsel it hired to examine the botched investigation of Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), carrying the investigation into next year.

It was unclear whether the extension was an indication that the outside lawyer, Billy Martin, found wrongdoing within the committee or whether he simply has yet to complete the initial stage of investigating the Waters matter.

Ethics Chairman Jo Bonner (R-Ala.) told the House Administration Committee during a hearing Wednesday that “our hopes and estimates for a quick resolution to Mr. Martin’s work may not be realized. While no final conclusions have been reached about whatever the ‘next steps’ in this process might encompass, it is highly possible that the contract with Mr. Martin will need to be extended into next year.”

Martin — a partner at the law firm Dorsey & Whitney, whose past clients have included former Sen. Larry Craig (R-Idaho) and other high-profile lawmakers — was hired by the Ethics Committee in July to investigate the actions of committee staffers during the Waters probe and determine how and if it should continue.

The committee had been investigating whether Waters and her staff intervened with federal regulators on behalf of a community bank in which her husband was heavily invested.

Last November, just days before a public ethics hearing was slated to begin, the committee announced that new information had arisen and the Waters trial would be postponed. Internal committee email surfaced in July suggesting that the delay was caused by concerns on behalf of the panel’s former staff director that political infighting within the committee had compromised the integrity of its investigation. The committee at that point announced the hiring of Martin to investigate the matter, giving him until Jan. 2, 2012, to file his report.

At the time, Waters claimed vindication.

“For the first time in the history of the ethics committee, it has initiated an inquiry into its own misconduct ... I am confident that the outside council’s review of the committee’s misconduct will conclude that my rights were violated and further investigation of me is not warranted,” she said in a statement at the time.

When the committee hired Martin, it explained that the independent investigator would first look into any possible wrongdoing by committee members and staffers and then determine whether the Waters case could proceed.

comments powered by Disqus




Want Roll Call on your doorstep?