- Edwards Releases Senate Fundraising Totals
- Academics Say Higher Education Prepared Them for Higher Office
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: The Mountain Region
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: New England
- Top Races in 2016: The Midwest
It’s not every day that an obscure bill with little support or momentum gets an overnight boost. But exactly that happened in 60 short minutes Sunday night.
The ideas of increasing disclosure regarding Members’ stock trades or restricting some trades altogether seem to be gaining traction after the proposals got prime-time endorsements on “60 Minutes.”
The CBS newsmagazine took Congress to task Sunday night for condoning alleged insider trading, with anchorman Steve Kroft tailing Members outside the Capitol to ask whether they would support a specific bill that seeks to ban the practice.
“Boy, that was some coverage, wasn’t it?” said Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.), one of the bill’s primary co-sponsors. “I hope it means more sponsors, and I hope we can finally get something done here.”
Whether the rare prime-time bully pulpit will translate to a vote on the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act remains to be seen. The bill had just nine co-sponsors before the segment aired and has not had a hearing this Congress.
However, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor told reporters Monday that although he is not familiar with the specifics of the STOCK Act, he is generally in favor of more disclosure when doubt is cast on the veracity of Members’ actions, saying that “we should be held to a higher standard.”
“I am for increased disclosure. If there is any sense of impropriety or any appearance of that, we should take extra steps to ensure the public’s cynicism is addressed,” the Virginia Republican said. “We’re not here to hide anything. And I have always been, when it comes to either financial disclosures or campaign finance disclosures, very supportive of full disclosure, as much as possible, so that the public can continue to make their decision on a full airing of the facts.”
But Cantor stopped short of saying that he plans to bring the bill or anything like it to the House floor for a vote.
The bill has not moved since it was referred to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution in June. A Judiciary aide said there was no update on the bill’s status as of Monday afternoon.
Nonetheless, the proposal is gaining more momentum than ever among Members.
Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), ranking member on the House Financial Services Committee, said in an email that the bill “is a good idea, and I would be in favor of some form of it in the future.”