House Administration ranking member Robert Brady and other Democrats on the committee are angry that Republicans approved a contract that triples the legal fees paid to defend the Defense of Marriage Act.
House Republicans have tripled the legal fees for the law firm hired to defend the Defense of Marriage Act in court, drawing complaints from Democratic leadership.
When the Department of Justice announced earlier this year that it would no longer defend the Defense of Marriage Act — the law barring the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages — Republican leaders signed a $500,000 contract with the firm of Bancroft PLLC.
On Sept. 30, the House finalized a modified version of that contract to bring the legal costs to $1.5 million.
Democrats on the House Administration Committee, which oversees outside contracting for in-house services, released a statement Tuesday blasting Republicans for upping the costs.
“The original contract was a misguided promise to waste a half-million dollars of taxpayer money,” read the statement from House Administration ranking member Robert Brady (D-Pa.) and Democratic colleagues Reps. Zoe Lofgren (Calif.) and Charlie Gonzalez (Texas). “Further spending to defend DOMA is simply unconscionable.”
They added that the increased legal costs were approved without “any semblance of transparency.”
When DOMA was passed in 1996, 118 Democrats in the House and 32 in the Senate voted for it.
The office of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) also weighed in Tuesday. “It is absolutely unconscionable that Speaker Boehner is tripling the cost for his legal boondoggle ... to defend discrimination in our country,” spokesman Drew Hammill said.
But Salley Wood, the Republican spokeswoman for the House Administration Committee, argued that the additional legal fees were necessary to successfully defend the law. She also countered Democrats’ claims that the legal arrangement was unnecessary, citing a ruling on Sept. 28 to uphold DOMA by the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.
“How much is the solicitor general spending to defend the health care law?” Wood said. “Why should health care and not DOMA, which passed both chambers with overwhelming majorities, deserve its day in court?”
Michael Steel, spokesman for Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), suggested that the Justice Department could one day see its funding levels reflect the costs currently shouldered by the House because Congress sets the department’s yearly budget.
“The cost of this litigation should and will be borne by the Department of Justice, which is shirking its responsibility to defend the law,” Steel said.
GPO Customers Offer Praise
The Government Printing Office is preparing itself for cuts and offering buyouts to employees, but it was able to announce some good news Tuesday morning: Customer satisfaction is high.
The GPO surveyed 750 of its federal agency customers and found that 91 percent of them were “satisfied overall” with the services they were receiving. The last time the GPO did a survey was in 2007.
Terri Henderson, 6, center, whose mother is El Salvador, attends a rally with members of Congress at Union Station's Columbus Circle to announce the Restore Opportunity, Strengthen, and Improve the Economy (ROSIE) Act on July 29, 2014. The legislation provides incentives for government contractors to pay a living wage and other benefits that would help low-income workers.