Sen. Lamar Alexander stressed the need to overhaul the No Child Left Behind Act: Its a five-year bill, and were in its ninth year.
Bipartisan efforts to overhaul the No Child Left Behind Act have been bogged down, leading frustrated Senate Republicans to propose their own package to free states from many of the law’s mandates.
Revising the decade-old law had been one of the few areas that seemed ripe for bipartisan compromise earlier this year, but slow progress in talks between Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chairman Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) and ranking member Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) prompted Republican lawmakers on the committee to put their own proposals on the table Wednesday.
“We need to get on with it,” said Sen. Lamar Alexander (Tenn.), the No. 3 Senate Republican and a former secretary of Education, in a briefing with reporters. “It’s a five-year bill, and we’re in its ninth year.”
The dispute centers on just how much flexibility states will have, with the GOP proposing to end many federal mandates, while maintaining the annual testing that is at the core of the law.
“The differences have boiled down between the Democrats and Republicans in the Senate to accountability,” Alexander said. “What I would call them is whether you want a national school board or not. Whether you want a federal definition, a Washington definition of a teacher evaluation system, whether you want a Washington definition of a growth model, whether you want a Washington definition of an achievement gap.
“I think all of those are good ideas, but Georgia, Illinois and Tennessee ought to come up with their own definitions,” he said, flanked by Sens. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) and Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.).
Isakson, who helped write the original law while a House Member, said it has worked, but he said the standards requiring yearly improvement are no longer appropriate because now most schools are going to be labeled as failing.
Isakson and Alexander said requirements for annual testing will remain and be improved, but the enforcement will fall to states and school boards.
“Transparency is the biggest hammer of all,” Isakson said.
“It’s better for the states and local school districts to take up the hammer, and the report cards that caused the improvement are still intact,” Alexander said.
Enzi complained in a hallway interview Wednesday that the two sides had reached agreement on how to deal with the biggest problems with the law, but are bogged down on details.
“What we did was first solve the big problems, and I think had agreement on that,” he said. But Enzi said Democrats want to try for a more comprehensive rewrite, which he does not support.