President Barack Obama’s re-election prospects look dimmer by the day, so — absent an economic turnaround — he’s likely to try to win in 2012 the way Harry Truman did in 1948: by blasting Republicans.
Every new poll contains bad political news for Obama, suggesting that if the election is a referendum on him, he’s headed for defeat.
So, he’s bound to emphasize that elections are a choice and charge that what Republicans are serving up — austerity, mean-spiritedness and retrenchment — will hurt most Americans, not help them.
Already in speeches this summer he’s been blaming “partisan brinksmanship” — meaning GOP opposition — for Congress’ failure to help put the economy back on track.
Presumably, he will lay out an ambitious jobs agenda in his address to Congress this week — he has nothing to lose — with every expectation that it will be dead on arrival among Republicans.
Then he can wail away at them as “do nothing” as Truman did the Republican-dominated 80th Congress.
Obama is in worse shape in the polls than Truman was at a comparable point in 1947. Obama’s Gallup poll approval rating is 39 percent. Truman’s was 55 percent, but it actually descended to 36 percent in April 1948, creating the near-universal perception that he would lose in November.
Unfortunately for Obama, the unemployment rate in 1947 and 1948 was 3.5 percent, and economic indicators were all improving despite labor strife and other difficult post-war adjustments.
Obama is burdened not just with a 9.1 percent unemployment rate but with the widespread fear that he and the federal government have no idea how to rekindle the economy and could not bring it off if they did know.
As Republican pollster Bill McInturff summarized the situation in a presentation last week, the collapse of consumer confidence is “chilling — not only for what it may portend for the economy but also for [Obama’s] re-election chances.”
The Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index hit 55.7 percent in August, down from 67.7 percent last October and 63.7 percent in July. “There is no precedent for an incumbent president being re-elected when this scale is at 75 or below,” McInturff said.
As Washington Post polling shows, only 33 percent of voters — Obama’s base — have confidence that the president can make the right decisions about the economy. Only 26 percent have confidence in the federal government.
The economic situation has eaten like acid into Obama’s public image. The Associated Press-GfK poll last month showed all-time lows for his ratings on strong leadership (51 percent), understanding the problems of ordinary Americans (53 percent) and even “caring about people like you” (55 percent).
He is even near his low for being likable, at 78 percent.
As many commentators have noted, Obama got elected as the ultimate national Rorschach test, invested with voters’ best hopes and greatest fears, with hopes giving him an upside.
Now he’s a Rorschach on the downside, with many liberals disappointed that he wasn’t the “transformational” figure they expected but a “compromiser” and with independents disappointed that he wasn’t a healer and unifier but a polarizer.
He got elected carrying 52 percent of independents, but his approval rating with them now is 38 percent, according to a Marist-McClatchy poll.
From left, Rep. Christopher H. Smith, R-N.J., David Goldman, the father of a child who was abducted to Brazil by the mother, and Arvind Chawdra, a father whose two children were abducted to India by their mother, attend a news conference in the Rayburn House Office Building on international child abduction.
Each year since 1990, CQ Roll Call has reviewed the financial disclosures of all 541 senators, representatives and delegates to determine the 50 richest members of Congress. This year's report, derived from forms covering the calendar year 2012, shows it took a net worth of $6.67 million to crack the exclusive club.