Feb. 13, 2016 SIGN IN | REGISTER

Some Still Hoping for a Clean Debt Vote

Bill Clark/Roll Call
At a news conference, Rep. John Larson, flanked by Reps. Xavier Becerra and Assistant Minority Leader James Clyburn, talks about the need for a speedy resolution.

A growing faction of House Democrats is renewing its push for a clean debt limit vote pressing ahead even as the White House and Senate Democrats appear committed to fulfilling Republican demands for spending cuts to accompany a deal. But liberals risk being labeled as out of touch with the political climate.

Despite their fellow Democrats' willingness to tackle the burgeoning deficit, a group of liberal lawmakers contends that its plan is the only one to bring a near-term solution ahead of Tuesday's projected default deadline.

They note that Speaker John Boehner's (R-Ohio) proposal is unlikely to win Senate passage and that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's (D-Nev.) plan is expected to face an equally grim fate in the House.

"If the negotiations don't succeed, you have to have an alternative, and the alternative is to do what we've always done, which is a clean vote," said Rep. Peter Welch (D-Vt.), who was trying to round up supporters this week. "And so this is a backup."

Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) announced that his group was behind a clean debt vote, and a handful of lawmakers were collecting signatures onto a letter Wednesday. Their thinking, according to Democratic aides, is that absent a bipartisan deal that can pass in both chambers, something needs to be ready to prevent a default Tuesday.

Still, it's highly unlikely the eleventh-hour proposal could win approval on the House floor. Conservative Republicans would likely reject it, and fiscally moderate Democrats would be reticent to vote to raise the debt ceiling without spending cuts.

Even Reid announced Wednesday that he would "tweak" his measure to achieve $2.4 trillion in spending cuts to meet a GOP demand to offset a $2.4 trillion increase in the debt limit.

Plus, Welch's proposal already failed on the floor earlier this year.

"The last time it was political," the Vermont Democrat said of the May 31 vote, which he explained was set up to "strengthen [Republicans'] hand in the negotiations."

The Democratic Caucus split in that vote, with 97 voting in favor and 82 against, including nearly every member of elected leadership. Some of those votes were lost in protest to what Democrats charged was a politicized floor vote set up to fail.

Welch predicted he could garner more support a second time around because "we're on the brink of Aug. 2 and there's increasing apprehension that negotiations will fail."

Not everyone is convinced. Aides note that moderates would likely still vote against the measure, even as the deadline draws near. And with so much of the debate focused on deficit reduction, one senior Democratic staffer said, "I think that makes us look out of touch, if everyone is for cuts, but us."

comments powered by Disqus




Want Roll Call on your doorstep?