Dec. 21, 2014 SIGN IN | REGISTER
Download CQ Roll Call's Definitive Guide to the 114th Congress | Sign Up for Roll Call Newsletters | Get the Latest on the Roll Call App

In Blaming Republicans, Authors Miss the Point

Thomas Mann and Norman Ornstein, two of Washingtons most respected political observers, have published two books on Congress in the past six years, the most recent being Its Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism.

Their latest work is more than an update of their 2006 book, The Broken Branch: How Congress Is Failing America and How to Get It Back on Track. This time they abandon any pretense of scholarly neutrality something they say is overdone, as is journalistic objectivity. Instead they finger the rogue elephant in the room conservative Republicans as being primarily responsible for Congress dysfunction.

Their charge deserves serious consideration. The authors warn that if the trend toward more extreme party polarization continues, our constitutional system of separated powers and checks and balances could become permanently gridlocked by parliamentary-style parties that are incapable of compromise and lack the accountability inherent in a parliamentary democracy.

First, is Congress today dysfunctional? I think most experts would agree it is when it comes to performing its most basic functions, such as funding the government in a timely manner and reauthorizing programs previously considered routine and nonpartisan. If one goes further to define dysfunctionality as a failure to enact a presidents programs, however, thats a misuse of the term and the Constitution.

Is this dysfunctionality peculiar to the current Republican Party in Congress? No, when Democrats were in the majority (as they still are in the Senate), they had comparable difficulties budgeting, including the enactment of deficit reductions and debt limit increases. Setting policy priorities and funding them are not a partisan problem. They are a function of a larger, systemic culture shaped by numerous external and internal forces, not the least of which are growing interest group demands on both parties in times of economic and fiscal stress. In what the authors call the permanent campaign, both parties, abetted by their interest group allies, are equally guilty of using electioneering tactics in lawmaking a zero-sum approach in what was historically designed to be a bargaining environment.

Are Congress hyper-partisanship and legislative failures unique to this point in our nations history? No, Congress has periodically gone through periods in which the degree of partisanship has run high and criticisms of the institution by the public and press have been legion. In the late 1800s, for instance, the two major parties were highly polarized and control of Congress flipped frequently between them as the public registered its dissatisfaction with the majority partys misreading of its mandate or its inability to act.

Mann and Ornsteins analysis of Congress today shows that both parties are moving toward their respective poles, as are American voters. Nevertheless, they seem to gloss over the fact that the Democratic Party is losing its moderates almost as fast as Republicans are gaining more conservative Members. The moderate House Blue Dog Coalition, for instance, lost half of its Members in the last election, and a preliminary estimate by the Bipartisan Policy Center reveals there might be only one left after the next election.

comments powered by Disqus

SIGN IN




OR

SUBSCRIBE

Want Roll Call on your doorstep?