- Edwards Releases Senate Fundraising Totals
- Academics Say Higher Education Prepared Them for Higher Office
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: The Mountain Region
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: New England
- Top Races in 2016: The Midwest
After voting to turn off sequestration’s across-the-board cuts to the military last week, House Republicans will look to reinforce their defense bona fides this week on the floor and in the Appropriations Committee.
The House will take up the fiscal 2013 National Defense Authorization Act starting Wednesday, which would authorize about $643 billion for national security programs, topping President Barack Obama’s request by nearly $4 billion.
At the same time, the Appropriations Committee will take up four subcommittee bills dealing with national security spending, including the defense bill, which also has more funding than the president requested.
Two appropriations bills will be in committee Wednesday and another two on Thursday, barring any unexpected amendments that could hold up the process.
Some of those bills could reach the floor as soon as the end of May, after the House returns from a weeklong recess that begins May 21.
It is still up in the air whether House leaders will, over the objections of some Republicans, bundle those bills, which deal with funding Defense, Homeland Security, State and foreign operations, and military construction and Veterans Affairs. The committee-passed Energy and water development bill, which contains funding for the nation’s nuclear arsenal, could be part of the package as well.
On the messaging front this week, Republican leaders remain intent on avoiding the pitfalls of social issues and sticking to an economic message, senior aides said. “We’re talking about jobs and they’re not,” one leadership aide said.
Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) will deliver remarks at the Peter G. Peterson Foundation Fiscal Summit on Tuesday, driving home their vision for the economy.
Indeed, even on issues that are not, strictly speaking, economic in nature, Republicans will look to use them to demonstrate the differences on fiscal matters between Republicans and Democrats.
For instance, when the House takes up the Violence Against Women Act this week, rather than focus on the social aspects of the legislation, the GOP will use the bill to launch an economic-based counterattack against Democrats’ message that Republicans are waging a “war on women.”
“Republicans are combating the war-on-women narrative by talking about how the Obama economy has adversely affected women,” a GOP aide explained.
Democrats, however, will argue that the House should have taken up the version of the Violence Against Women Act that passed the Senate rather than the House version, which they say rolls back protections against women.
But controversial amendments tacked to the defense authorization bill could also threaten to derail the GOP jobs message, especially as Obama’s stated support for gay marriage might continue to drive headlines.