The same political climate that has hamstrung President Barack Obama on gay marriage is also preventing embattled Senate Democrats from stepping out on the hot-button social issue.
Though Obama campaigned in 2008 on a post-partisan platform, it’s clear that there are still “red states” and “blue states” when it comes to the debate, and whether Senators are willing to support gay marriage openly reflects that map.
“I’m 100 percent onboard, so I would say that’s why I talk about it because I think it is important,” Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) said as to whether he thinks it’s important for Democrats to talk about marriage equality.
Whitehouse, who is up for re-election this cycle, said he is “sure” many of his colleagues feel similarly. But any sort of gay marriage bill is likely to meet stiff resistance in the chamber, and Democratic leaders are unlikely to force their Members to take potentially politically explosive votes on something that would hit a brick wall in the House, too.
“It’s hard to see how you get that through the Republican filibuster blockade on our side, and good luck with the Speaker calling it up,” Whitehouse said. “I don’t think it would be anything more than a vain effort.”
For Democratic Senators from more conservative states facing more challenging re-election bids — such as Claire McCaskill in Missouri, Jon Tester in Montana and Bill Nelson in Florida — that effort likely is not worth having.
Without the administration taking a clear stand on the issue, Senate Democrats would only complicate the president’s current dilemma. Democratic leaders, who are often deferential to the president, are not likely to act in a way that would be destructive to the national campaign. Plus, Democratic lawmakers looking to prove their bona fides to the gay rights community can point to their efforts last year in repealing the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. Senate Democrats have also recently pushed to add gay, lesbian and transgender individuals to the Violence Against Women Act, and they passed a hate crimes bill in 2009.
Still, McCaskill deflected on the question of whether Senate Democrats should bring up the issue. “It’s the president’s decision,” she said.
Each year since 1990, CQ Roll Call has reviewed the financial disclosures of all 541 senators, representatives and delegates to determine the 50 richest members of Congress. This year's report, derived from forms covering the calendar year 2012, shows it took a net worth of $6.67 million to crack the exclusive club.