In the first quarter of an election year, sitting Members of Congress can use the power of incumbency to post big fundraising numbers and send a message to challengers that they have the resources to make sure they return to Capitol Hill for another term.
But incumbents can also telegraph another message altogether: weakness.
Both parties saw numbers to be excited about in the first-quarter fundraising reports. Democrats, on offense this cycle after losing the House majority in 2010, crowed about more than a dozen of their challengers outraising Republican incumbents. Republicans, meanwhile, were happy to see some fundraising successes not only among their challenger candidates but also among their vulnerable Members, such as Rep. Dan Lungren (Calif.).
When challengers outraise Members, it can be a fluke that’s not reflective of a larger electoral trend. But more often than not, it can be a red flag that things are not well in the Member’s campaign or that he has a particularly strong challenger.
Still, in a cycle where money from outside organizations such as super PACs is expected to play an outsized role, the fundraising expectations game is only part of the picture.
In some states that recently were hotbeds of competitive House race activity — where fundraising mattered just two short years ago — the playing field has shrunk considerably because of redistricting. Republican legislatures across the country have shored up enough incumbents’ districts that the GOP is favored to hold the House majority. In fact, hotly contested presidential states such as Virginia, Pennsylvania and Ohio feature only a few serious races where a House seat could change control in November. In those three states, there are only about five or six competitive races out of 45 districts.
The latest quarterly reports, covering the first three months of the year, show that for the most part, vulnerable incumbents are maintaining a strong cash-on-hand advantage over their challengers, who, in many cases, still face primaries before turning their focus to November.
Challengers who have run a serious campaign before have a particular leg up in the fundraising race.
Attorney Ann Kuster, who was the Democratic nominee in 2010 in New Hampshire’s 2nd district, outraised Rep. Charles Bass (R-N.H.) $352,000 to $269,000 in the first three months of 2012. It was the fourth consecutive quarter that Kuster raised more than Bass. Bass barely beat Kuster last cycle with a GOP wave at his back. As his fundraising shows, he has a hill to climb to keep his seat.
Just south of the New Hampshire border, in Massachusetts’ sixth district, the fundraising of eight-term Rep. John Tierney (D) was a sign of deeper troubles. His challenger, former state Sen. Richard Tisei (R), outraised the Congressman for the second quarter in a row, posting $354,000 to Tierney’s $326,000. Tierney has been hounded by his family’s legal issues — his wife pleaded guilty to federal tax charges in 2010 — and faces a real fight to keep his seat.
Rep. Christopher H. Smith, R-N.J., left, David Goldman, center, and Arvind Chawdra right, attend a news conference in the Rayburn House Office Building on international child abduction. Goldman and Chawdra are fathers whose children were abducted by their mothers and taken abroad.
Each year since 1990, CQ Roll Call has reviewed the financial disclosures of all 541 senators, representatives and delegates to determine the 50 richest members of Congress. This year's report, derived from forms covering the calendar year 2012, shows it took a net worth of $6.67 million to crack the exclusive club.