When the Supreme Court begins to deliberate President Barack Obama’s signature health care law Monday, it will serve as a bitter reminder to Democrats of the blows leveled at their causes by the conservative Roberts court.
Though the outcome of the high-profile case reviewing the constitutionality of the health care law’s marquee feature, the individual mandate, is unknown, plenty of other decisions have given Democrats pause or even rallied them to battle with the court in ways rarely seen before.
Perhaps no moment encapsulated the tension between the Democratic agenda and the court’s decisions more than the first nationally televised spat between a sitting president and a sitting Supreme Court justice.
“With all due deference to separation of powers ... the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that, I believe, will open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our elections,” Obama said in his 2010 State of the Union address of the controversial Citizens United v. Federal Election Committee’s ruling in front of a joint Congress, a national audience — and most of the Supreme Court.
“Not true,” a stunned Justice Samuel Alito could be seen mouthing to the president on camera.
The tension between Democratic politics and the conservative-leaning court has not been unique to that moment, however. Some of the most criticized cases include Citizens United and a 2007 ruling that rolled back part of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform law that barred corporate-funded issue advocacy ads close to an election.
Congress has been happy to engage on other issues — but with mixed results.
There was the floor battle to pass the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, the first major initiative signed into law by Obama, in 2009. The legislation, named after the unsuccessful plaintiff in the case, reversed a decision handed down by the Roberts court that limited when women could sue for gender-based pay discrimination in the workplace. Ledbetter had sued Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. for pay discrimination, but the court said she needed to have filed her complaint within 180 days of Goodyear making the decision to discriminate. Previous precedent held that an employer renewed the discrimination each time it issued a paycheck.
When the bill was introduced in 2008, rank-and-file Democrats took to the floor en masse to malign the court’s decision and reiterate their dedication to reversing it.