Dec. 18, 2014 SIGN IN | REGISTER
Download CQ Roll Call's Definitive Guide to the 114th Congress | Sign Up for Roll Call Newsletters | Get the Latest on the Roll Call App

Wins, Delegates and the Long GOP Fight Ahead

Whitney Curtis/Getty Images
Mitt Romney came in third Tuesday in primaries in Alabama and Mississippi. But the chatter that the losses were bad news for the former governor doesn’t ring true, Stuart Rothenberg writes.

After the political roller coaster that weve seen over the past year, you would think that veteran observers (or at least people on television) would use a little wider perspective in evaluating and explaining Tuesdays GOP results. I dont expect the candidates to do that because they are all about regurgitating a message and deluding themselves to believe that they can and will win. They have to do that each morning and begin their campaign grind.

Romney would love to knock out his rivals, broaden his coalition and sweep quickly to the GOP nomination. But none of that is happening, and to expect it to change this past Tuesday or next Tuesday is simply unrealistic.

That doesnt change the reality, though. Romney remains far ahead in delegates, even after most states in the South have had their primaries. Because the calendar still includes plenty of states with large urban and suburban Republican populations and more moderate voters, and with the former governor still having the most resources and organization, Romney remains the solid favorite for the Republican nomination. It will be messy it already is but thats a different matter.

While the early primaries and caucuses were about wins and losses as candidates tried to create some momentum, the GOP race is now a long grind of accumulating delegates. And as the Romney folks understood all along, delegates from Guam and American Samoa count just as much as delegates from Alabama.

Does the long fight damage the Republican Party? Of course its a problem, not an asset.

Yes, the fight in 2008 between Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton exposed a fracture in the Democratic Party between African-Americans and upscale white liberals on one side and working-class white voters on the other but the contest for the Democratic nomination lacked the downright meanness that is already apparent in this years GOP battle.

The Republicans are calling each other liars, and the bitterness between the three leading candidates is palpable. In addition, the existence of super PACs, and the differences in the candidates resources, has ratcheted up the rhetoric and the feelings of unfairness.

Moreover, the 2008 Democratic race took place after eight years of President George W. Bush, with wars in Iraq and Afghanistan drawing increased criticism, Americas banking system teetering and economic forecasts growing increasingly gloomy. Americans were hungry for change, and the Democrats were battling over two interesting, talented voices for that change.

This years GOP field is simply less imposing than the 2008 Democratic field. Romney has weaknesses, but at least he crosses the threshold of credibility as a candidate for president. Most of the other Republican hopefuls either fell quickly by the wayside or have yet to demonstrate they have the broad appeal needed to win the White House.

The fight between Romney, Santorum and Gingrich has dominated the national media, but not in a good way. Most of what we have learned about the candidates is not favorable Romneys tax rate, his wifes two Cadillacs, Santorums views on birth control and Gingrichs ego. No wonder Romneys personal ratings have suffered over the past few months.

comments powered by Disqus




Want Roll Call on your doorstep?