Only a few hundred residents need to be shifted in New Hampshires reapportionment, and Rep. Frank Guinta has been pushing for minimal changes to be made in the new map.
The New Hampshire House of Representatives finally began to move ahead Monday with the state's redistricting.
The state House committee that oversees the process recommended a plan that called for small changes in the single line that separates the state's two Congressional districts.
The Granite State's two GOP Congressmen have had what one Republican on the ground describes as "a lively discussion" about how the new line should be drawn. Only a few hundred residents need to shift between districts, but Rep. Charles Bass (R) has been lobbying for larger changes. Rep. Frank Guinta (R), on the other hand, has been pushing for minimal changes to the map.
Bass has a much more difficult race for re-election than Guinta, and the changes he sought were a means to bolster his electoral chances against Democrat Ann McLane Kuster.
"We opted to go with the plan that made the least amount of change, with near perfect deviation and with very little impact on the communities," state Rep. David Bates (R), vice chairman of the state House Special Committee on Redistricting, told the New Hampshire Union Leader.
A New Hampshire Republican explained that the reason for such a late map is that the August downballot primary creates "limited urgency."
New York: It's Over, Court-Drawn Lines All but Official
New York's redistricting process has been most unconventional, but in some ways, the long-held conventional wisdom was right.
For months, political types in New York — which lost two districts in reapportionment — said they expected one Democratic- held district and one Republican-held district to be eliminated, with one in New York City and one upstate. It's now quite likely that a map drawn by a federal judge, which eliminates the New York City district of Republican Rep. Bob Turner and the upstate district of retiring Democratic Rep. Maurice Hinchey, will become law.
But the bipartisan expectation among some political operatives in the Empire State was that the involvement of the judiciary would spur the split-control Legislature to act after a year of deadlock. The thinking was that Albany officials would be loath to give up their once-in-a-decade opportunity and that their desire to fulfill their constitutional responsibility to redraw lines would override their partisan bickering.
"The conventional wisdom was just wrong," a New York Democratic operative said.