- Edwards Releases Senate Fundraising Totals
- Academics Say Higher Education Prepared Them for Higher Office
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: The Mountain Region
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: New England
- Top Races in 2016: The Midwest
Speaker John Boehner’s drive to decentralize power in the House could come back to haunt him now that he needs control of his Conference to push a compromise debt limit deal — the most important legislation of his Speakership — through the chamber.
Since the start of the 112th Congress, the Ohio Republican has made reforming how the House works a central component of his tenure. He turned over control of legislation to committee chairmen, chose a Whip in Rep. Kevin McCarthy (Calif.) who works with — rather than hammers — Members on votes, and has been willing to take significant defeats to allow the sometimes rancorous chamber to “work its will.”
In February, Boehner said his decision came about because of “20 years of watching leaders tighten down the process, tighten down the process, tighten down the process, trying to reconfigure all the rules in order for them to pass their agenda, the leader’s agenda. That is not my job.”
In theory, the open debates on the floor, the wrangling over the continuing resolution and a series of educational efforts should have resulted in a Conference which, while strongly conservative, still recognized that legislating at its core requires a certain amount of compromise and accepting the best deal possible.
Instead, a vocal portion of Boehner’s rank and file has, as one aide put it, “allowed the perfect to be the enemy of the good” while breeding distrust for leadership.
Now, with the economy potentially facing a massive meltdown if the United States defaults on its debt, Boehner is faced with the stark reality that several key players in his Conference feel that even considering to raise the nation’s debt limit is the most compromise they are willing to make.
“Compromise? The compromise is the Cut, Cap and Balance Act,” said Rep. Jim Jordan (Ohio), chairman of the powerful Republican Study Committee. “That’s the compromise.”
Jordan noted that conservatives agreed to vote on that bill, which includes a debt limit increase contingent on passage of a balanced budget amendment by both chambers.
Others were even more openly critical of leadership’s handling of the debt limit negotiations.
“I think they’ve negotiated too much with the other side. They’ve engaged in weeks of private little daily negotiations when it was clear the other side wasn’t serious,” Rep. Joe Walsh (R-Ill.) said.
“I don’t know strategically how strong we’ve been. I wish they had gone to the president three weeks ago and said, ‘Here’s what we want, here’s our cellphone numbers’ and walked away. They didn’t do that, and now we’re down to the end. It’s clear what the Republican rank and file want, which is structural reform,” Walsh added.