July 30, 2014 SIGN IN | REGISTER

Thompson: ANCs Should Be Held to Same 8(a) Standard

Given the current economic climate, participation in the Small Business Administration 8(a) small and disadvantaged business program can be the difference between success and failure for small, struggling businesses in communities all across America.

Unfortunately, many small or disadvantaged businesses owned by minorities, women and veterans are unable to fully participate in the SBA’s 8(a) program because they have been crowded out of the federal marketplace by the special carve-outs afforded Alaska Native Corporations that participate in the program. For example, awards to non-ANC 8(a) firms are capped at $3.5 million for services or $5.5 million for goods, yet they are uncapped for ANCs and often far surpass these amounts.

Furthermore, while non-ANC 8(a) firms have to prove every year that they are economically and socially disadvantaged, ANCs are irrefutably presumed to be socially and economically disadvantaged, even if the ANC is managed by a nonminority millionaire. As a result, ANCs are squeezing out small businesses in communities all across America that could otherwise serve as catalysts for local economic growth.

Since discovering the disproportionate awarding of contracts to ANCs versus small, local 8(a) businesses following Hurricane Katrina, I have expressed a long-standing interest in leveling the playing field in this vital program. The SBA has finally responded.

New rules for 8(a) businesses, including ANCs, have gone into effect. Major changes that are consistent with legislation I introduced were made. For example, ANCs will now have to perform at least 40 percent of the work on joint ventures, preventing them from simply serving as conduits for large corporations seeking to reap the benefits of ANC special privileges; and steps have been taken to require ANCs to prove their economic benefit to Alaska Natives. 

But more must be done to equalize the playing field. 

Like other 8(a) companies, ANCs can receive sole-source contracts outside the open bidding process. However, the ability to receive sole-source contracts is where the similarity between ANCs and other 8(a) companies begins and ends. SBA rules provide ANCs with advantages that virtually eliminate competition from other 8(a) businesses. Because of this favored position, ANCs, which constitute 2 percent of 8(a) eligible firms, receive over 25 percent of all federal contracts awarded under the 8(a) program. 

Forty years ago, when initially proposed as a means to settle the aboriginal land claims of Native Alaskans, few would have imagined that the bulk of ANC revenues, which totaled $6.9 billion in 2008, would go to Beltway-based corporations who “partner” with ANCs to bypass traditional rules and receive sole-source Homeland Security, Defense and other complex contracts, not to the people the law was intended to benefit. 

Prior to the rule change it was difficult to see the benefit afforded Alaska natives by ANCs. One was left to speculate because ANCs were not required to publicly disclose the amount, timing or existence of shareholder distributions. Absent this concrete and objective proof, we were left with mere anecdotes from individuals about benefits and scholarships. This lack of knowledge was exacerbated by the fact that despite a 1,386 percent growth since 2000 in federal contracting dollars that go to ANCs, the poverty rate in Alaska has actually risen to 9.4 percent. 

comments powered by Disqus

SIGN IN




OR

SUBSCRIBE

Want Roll Call on your doorstep?