Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin acknowledged last week that the appropriations bills may have to wait until after the November elections.
With a high-stakes election bearing down on them and partisan gridlock stalling most legislation in the Senate, Democrats have begun to acknowledge that the federal government will not be fully funded until after November and may even have to wait until 2011.
That outcome is certainly a possibility, Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin said of having to punt on spending bills until next year. The Illinois Democrat is a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee.
It depends on the cooperation of the Republicans, he added. It may be that well just take what we need to take and do to make it through the election and come back afterward and tackle the big spending issues.
Appropriations ranking member Thad Cochran also acknowledged the seeming inevitability of at least a lame-duck session after the elections to address government spending.
That is not unlikely, the Mississippi Republican said. Asked about the possibility of postponing action until a new Congress is seated next year, he said: It could happen again. Its hard to predict that far in advance.
The likelihood of a long delay was enhanced last week when Senate Republicans made the unusual move of injecting some partisanship into the committee process. Though the panel has traditionally avoided partisan displays, all 12 Appropriations Republicans signed a letter demanding that Democrats slash at least $20 billion from President Barack Obamas budget request.
Democrats on the committee adopted a proposal to cut spending by $14 billion; House Democrats have proposed a $7 billion cut.
Even though Senate Republicans and Democrats differ by only $6 billion out of more than $1.1 trillion in total spending, the GOP has seized on spending reductions as part of their election-year mantra and are expected to vote largely in lockstep against the Democratic bills.
If the GOP also decides to attempt a filibuster over the $6 billion difference, it could be next to impossible for Democrats to pass anything but a stop-gap spending bill intended to keep the government funded in the interim.
At a testy Appropriations markup last Thursday, Durbin challenged Republicans logic, saying he did not understand how they could write a letter demanding cuts while at the same time requesting earmarks totaling $1.3 billion.
I dont understand how you can send us both of these letters, Durbin said. I dont think this is consistent.
Democrats on the committee also hinted that they may also feel the need to abandon bipartisanship, given that they believe the Republican position makes it pointless to negotiate on what should go into each spending measure.
But Republicans said the Democrats failure to pass a budget resolution this year makes their stance even more important, and they pointed to recent polls showing Americans are increasingly concerned about fiscal discipline.