Nov. 21, 2014 SIGN IN | REGISTER
Roll Call Casualty List: See Which Incumbents Lost | Check Results Here With Our Interactive Elections Map | Sign Up for Roll Call Newsletters

Democrats Resist Retirement Pull

Related Content

Several veteran House Democrats insist that a return to the minority won’t push them into retirement, even though historical trends suggest a wave of Democrats won’t seek re-election in 2012.

After the GOP lost the majority in 2006, 27 Republican House Members retired or sought other office in the next two years. During that same time, only three Democrats retired. The question now is whether Democrats, after surrendering 63 seats on Election Day, will have the same problem.

“Democrats should be braced for a significant number of Members to retire,” a senior Democratic aide said.

“When the reality of being in the minority sets in, I think Democrats need to be prepared for a very aggressive effort to keep Members here,” the aide said.

But many veteran Members insist they have no plans to leave, including Rep. John Dingell, who in February 2009 became the longest-serving House Member in history. Asked last week about his plans, the 84-year-old Michigan Democrat, who was just re-elected to his 28th full term, said, “work like hell, protect the health bill, look out for consumers, protect Social Security, protect Medicare from the Republicans who want to privatize both and look after the people of my district, see to it that we get first-class consumer services.”

Rep. Louise Slaughter, who turned 81 this summer, said becoming the ranking member on the Rules Committee again after four years in the majority was not making her think about tossing in the towel.

“Listen, I’ve got work to do, and it doesn’t matter where I’m sitting,” the New York Democrat said. “It matters that I can help my constituents and represent them. ... No, I’m not going away mad.”

Other lawmakers, such as Rep. Barney Frank (Mass.), dismissed the question entirely. The 70-year-old Democrat, who was just elected to his 16th term, said that it was too early to think about retirements.

Rep. John Conyers, who is expected to take on the ranking member role on the Judiciary Committee, agreed. The 81-year-old Michigan Democrat, who faces personal issues, including his wife being sentenced to three years in prison after being convicted on bribery charges, was recently elected to his 24th term.

“You’ve got to be kidding me,” Conyers said in answer to the question.

Democratic Caucus Vice Chairman Xavier Becerra predicted there will not be a big wave of Democratic retirements.

“If you take a look at the membership, we have a lot of folks who are still very active, I think, still have quite a bit to give to the country,” said the California Democrat, who at age 52 is a decade younger than the next youngest member of elected Democratic leadership, Caucus Chairman John Larson (Conn.). “I don’t think anyone who really believes that they still have some fuel in the tank is going to say, ‘no.’ I think folks came back ready to do some more work.”

Still, Larson acknowledged in an interview that there is concern about a swell of retirements going into the minority.

“Every cycle you worry about that,” Larson said, but he noted that the Democrats who made it through the last election cycle have “proven to be durable.”

This cycle’s retirement season could also be complicated by redistricting.

comments powered by Disqus

Chart

SIGN IN




OR

SUBSCRIBE

Want Roll Call on your doorstep?