Feb. 12, 2016 SIGN IN | REGISTER

Appropriations Subcommittee Likely Spared

At the start of the 109th Congress in 2005, Republicans proposed sweeping changes to the House Appropriations Committee, including eliminating the Subcommittee on the Legislative Branch and rolling its duties into the full committee.

And though the House GOP, having once more seized control of the chamber, is bent on spending cuts and committee reorganization, Members and staff say eliminating the subcommittee again is not among their priorities in the 112th.

GOP leadership has made no official decision or statement and will not do so at least until the Republican Steering Committee votes on a chairman, a spokesman said. The vote is expected early this week.

Speaker-designate John Boehner has called for reviewing overall committee structure and removing duplicative committees — reasons his spokesman cited Wednesday for eliminating the Energy Independence and Global Warming Committee next year.

But one GOP transition staffer said it would be a surprise to see the Ohio Republican on the side of disbanding the Subcommittee on the Legislative Branch, calling him “a steward at heart.”

“It’s kind of part of his shtick that he takes care of everything he has. He irons his own shirts. He cuts his own grass. He’s a neat freak,” the staffer said. “So if you think it’s important to maintain things, then why wouldn’t you want to have a legislative branch Appropriations subcommittee to focus on that sort of thing?”

The subcommittee oversees the House budget as well as the budgets of the Architect of the Capitol, Capitol Police, Library of Congress, Capitol Visitor Center and other agencies.

Then-Appropriations Chairman Jerry Lewis (R-Calif.) — now the ranking member and again in the hunt for the chairmanship — eliminated the subcommittee in 2005.

Democrats criticized him for acquiescing to the will of then-Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas), who proposed the idea. It was restored when Democrats took over the House in 2007.

“They largely got rid of that because of all of the bad stories about cost overruns on the CVC under the Republicans,” a Democratic staffer said. “Eliminate the subcommittee and it becomes much less of an in-your-face story.”

But next year, preserving the subcommittee would provide a valuable venue for publicizing the cuts in their own backyard that Republicans have promised, said one contender for the Appropriations chairmanship, also a former chairman of the subcommittee.

Rep. Jack Kingston, who chaired the subcommittee before it was abolished, said it serves an important purpose.

“The more scrutiny any spending act has, the easier it would be to find waste and duplicity,” the Georgia Republican said Friday. “Nationally, it’s not a high-profile committee, but it does sort of show and tell a little bit about us and our own culture.”

Similarly, Rep. Tom Cole, who co-chairs the GOP transition team and sits on the subcommittee, said eliminating it “would be unwise to do,” though he expressed no ambitions for the chairmanship.

“I think that committee performs an important function,” the Oklahoma Republican said. “It’s not one of the bigger or more glamorous subcommittees on Appropriations, but I think it’s very easy for abuses to grow up within the system we operate unless you’re constantly weeding the garden.”

comments powered by Disqus




Want Roll Call on your doorstep?