In an era of change, Sen. James Inhofe is unapologetic about standing his ground.
“He’s not seen as a rebel around here by any means … but he’s an independent thinker,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said of the Oklahoma Republican.
Inhofe, 76, is comfortable being a contrarian. In an interview last week, he recalled a time when one of his grandchildren “came up to me and said, ‘Pop-I, Why do you always do things that nobody else does?’ … and I said, ‘because nobody else does.’”
Case in point: As many of his GOP colleagues reversed long-held positions on an earmark ban last week, Inhofe proudly defended his support of the practice.
Republicans adopted an internal rules change to create a voluntary ban on requesting any kind of earmark — including transportation projects, tax cuts for particular industry sectors or other Congressionally directed funding.
The resolution even attracted the support of Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) a day before the Conference voted on the ban. McConnell has long supported the practice.
But rather than align with his Conference, Inhofe threw himself into the fight. In floor speeches and interviews, Inhofe accused his colleagues of abandoning their constitutional responsibility to determine how federal money will be spent.
“This earmark debate is a great example” of Inhofe’s indifference to public opinion or peer pressure, Graham added.
And when some conservatives — such as Rep. Michele Bachmann (Minn.) and Sen.-elect Rand Paul (Ky.) — suddenly balked at the idea of the Obama administration making all the decisions and suggested that some earmarks were not, in fact, earmarks, Inhofe pounced: “It’s almost as if they’re just saying we’re not going to call them earmarks ... [and] there’s just hypocrisy in the whole thing, and yet you’d be surprised how the people hated me. Frankly, I just thought I was dealing with it honestly,” he said after the fight.
Inhofe’s colleagues said he is motivated by principles, not politics: “He’s very passionate and he can be as partisan as the best of them. But deep down, he wants to help people,” a second Republican Senator said.
Even so, Inhofe has often found himself on the outside without many allies, and sometimes his position is of his own making. In 2003, for instance, Inhofe accused Sen. John McCain of trying to perpetrate “the biggest hoax” in the history of the Senate by insisting that global warming existed.
Inhofe, ranking member on the Environment and Public Works Committee, acknowledged that the two men have had intense disagreements over climate change and earmarks, a practice the Arizona Republican has long been opposed to. “I’ve disagreed with him on a lot of things in the Armed Services Committee,” Inhofe said.
But “every time I think about being angry, I think about the time he spent in Hanoi,” and realize that “we have two pretty strong-willed people with opposing views on a lot of things. But I’ve told him I love him,” Inhofe said.
Roll Call has launched a new feature, Hill Navigator, to advise congressional staffers and would-be staffers on how to manage workplace issues on Capitol Hill. Please send us your questions anything from office etiquette, to handling awkward moments, to what happens when the work life gets too personal. Submissions will be treated anonymously.