Tis the season of 20-year-old divorce records, drunken-driving arrests, criminal complaints by ex-lovers and college pranks turned sour.
The trickle that started this spring and became a stream this summer is now a flood of dated court records and traffic tickets. No past incident is too small for glaring attention in an environment where an expanse of highly competitive races has both parties clawing for every advantage in every district, and partisan websites offer endless avenues for publishing.
As the election season nears a mud-slinging end, the once-shadowy business of opposition research stands among the professional endeavors of just about every campaign.
Opposition research is hardly new in political campaigns. In Robert Penn Warrens 1946 masterpiece All The Kings Men, Governor Willie Stark tells his aide, Jack Burden, to dig up dirt on an opponent and make it stick.
The mission and the fundamental campaign strategies remain the same. But the matter of who does the work and how much gets done is changing rapidly. It is difficult to quantify the growth in opposition research because campaigns rarely identify their oppo expenditures in reports to the Federal Election Commission. For the 2010 election cycle, House campaigns and political action committees have reported only about $200,000 in expenditures labeled opposition research, according to FEC records compiled by CQ MoneyLine. Even that tiny number is about double the amount reported in the entire 2004 election cycle (discounting a $10,000 payment made by the Service Employees International Union for presidential opposition research that year).
But practitioners say there is no doubt more opposition research is being generated and more media outlets are publishing opposition research than ever before.
For starters, the major parties are doing more. John Neumann, head of the National Republican Congressional Committees independent expenditure research unit, said that over the years hes seen the staff climb from seven to 10 or 11, and this year they were brought on board earlier in the election cycle.
The Democratic side has shown similar growth. Spokeswoman Jennifer Crider said the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee had 10 researchers on staff in 2006; now it has 16.
But practitioners say much of the growth has occurred outside the political parties, with private consultants feeding off the explosion of independent expenditures and nonprofit political organizations that are now allowed to accept direct corporate and union donations.
After the 2008 election, there was definitely an uptick in people who were out there offering [research] services, said Kevin Wright, founder and director of the Old Dominion Research Group, a Republican research firm. A lot of people on the GOP side who were out of a job ... were forced into the position of having to make a living for themselves.
The Internet has also contributed to the industrys growth, Neumann said. You have these campaigns that are not necessarily using sophisticated opposition research techniques, but you are definitely seeing them doing some research.
Neumann added that more amateurs are doing it ... peoples ability to use Google makes everyone automatically an opposition researcher. You dont let your sister go out on a date without doing a basic background search on the guy.