As the Obama administration moves to restrain Pentagon spending, nervous defense contractors have increased their contributions to Congressional candidates, who could have the final say on the fate of multibillion-dollar weapons systems.
Political giving by defense companies is on pace to hit record highs this election cycle, according to a CQ MoneyLine analysis of Federal Election Commission reports.
Defense analysts say it is no surprise that the industry has picked up its political activity. Many of the large aerospace and defense firms are bracing for stiffer competition for federal contracts that have been the backbone of their business, these insiders say.
“The major defense contractors are beating the bushes to get their employees to contribute to their PACs because layoffs are looming as a result of decreased defense spending and canceled weapons systems,” defense lobbyist Michael Herson said.
After a decade in which military budgets have more than doubled, Defense Secretary Robert Gates has warned that such increases can’t continue. Gates wants to restrict growth of the $530 billion Pentagon budget to 1 percent next year.
That has led defense and aerospace firms to donate more than $13 million to Congressional candidates through the end of August. That figure is close to what they doled out for the entire 2008 election cycle and is more than $3 million more than in the 2006 season.
Since companies and interest groups generally accelerate their giving in the final months of the campaign, defense donations are likely to far exceed past amounts when final numbers are reported at the end of the year.
The defense activity is also notable because it is ahead of the pace of other industries and interest groups, who have yet to catch up to last cycle’s contributions.
For example, medical stakeholders so far have contributed $10 million less than they did in the 2008 cycle, and labor unions have shelled out almost $20 million less than they did in the previous election period. Overall, giving from political action committees is almost $110 million less so far this cycle than in the 2008 season.
Some of the largest defense firms have already topped what they gave last cycle.
Lockheed Martin Corp. has contributed $2.5 million to candidates, leadership PACs and party committees. In the entire 2008 cycle, the defense giant gave $2.2 million, about the same as it did in the 2006 cycle.
“Our PAC membership has increased as have some of the contributions by our PAC members,” a statement from Lockheed Martin said.
Loren Thompson, a defense analyst with the Lexington Institute, said Lockheed Martin’s political activity is a good barometer of the industry.
“Lockheed Martin is sort of like a trending stock for the whole defense sector,” he said.
Honeywell International Inc., which ranks among the top PACs in giving, has contributed almost $4.5 million so far this cycle, compared with $3.1 million in 2008 and $1.6 million in 2006.