Feb. 10, 2016 SIGN IN | REGISTER

Senate’s Slow Pace Frustrates Newer Members

File Photo
Sen. Mark Begich said he’s hopeful that the rise of some younger Senators into subcommittee chairmanships means they will soon start moving legislation.

The glacial pace of action in the Senate this year is starting to wear on some of the ambitious junior Democrats who want more of a record to run on.

Several first-term Democrats said the all-encompassing budget and debt debates have put other ideas on hold from education to energy to infrastructure and more.

"We know the Founding Fathers wanted the Senate to be a place of deliberation, but they probably couldn't have imagined sometimes how slow. ... It is frustrating, in a word," Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.) said.

Indeed, the deficit talks are "sucking the air out of the room," Sen. Mark Begich (D-Alaska) said.

And Sen. Mark Udall said that while the debate over the debt limit must be the priority with an August deadline on the horizon for a default on federal debts, he would like to see action move more quickly and have other issues teed up.

"We do need to first and foremost deal with the '12 budget, the deficit ceiling increase and the Simpson-Bowles or a Simpson-Bowles-like proposal," the Colorado Democrat said. "My frustration is tied to the fact that let's get to work now on those policy debates, not wait until Aug. 1."

Udall said that committees right now feel "hamstrung" by the debt debate and that he has held off on some of his own legislative proposals until the air clears.

"Until we get the parameters in place for our long-term budgeting, we shouldn't be starting new programs or dealing with other things," he said. "But that shouldn't be an excuse for letting our policy debate linger and languish and bump along while the rest of the world is putting in place an energy policy ... while other countries are dealing with their immigration system ... while other countries are investing in infrastructure."

But it's not just the budget debate that has thwarted Senate action. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) put a noncontroversial small-business bill on the floor for five weeks of debate, only to pull it in a dispute over whether to vote on an amendment by Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine).

Senate Democrats also have made the calculated decision for now not to do a budget resolution of their own which would expose them to unlimited amendments on the floor and staged a messaging vote on the House Republican budget instead.

Democrats have also blamed Republicans for blocking other bills, such as one targeting oil company tax breaks.

comments powered by Disqus




Want Roll Call on your doorstep?