The economy is weak and the public is angry. What should President Barack Obama do? He could do what Richard Nixon did: Go to China.
I dont mean take a trip to Beijing. I mean do something unexpected and out of political character. In this case, listen to Republicans and the business community (and a few Democrats) and try using tax cuts to get the economy moving.
He could call for Congress to postpone the scheduled repeal of most or all of President George W. Bushs 2001 and 2003 tax cuts and also call for a cut in the corporate tax rate, now second-highest in the world.
He also could call for a payroll tax holiday to encourage hiring and possibly win bipartisan support for some stimulus spending, daring Republicans to make a fuss about the danger of enlarging the federal deficit.
He could address the deficit in next years budget after the bipartisan debt commission comes up with a comprehensive solution at the end of this year, which should include tax and entitlement reform plus recommendations for new revenue sources.
Obama clearly is a Keynesian and so are his economic advisers. Their 2009 stimulus plan was heavy on government spending to fight the recession.
Obama claims its working, but the public doesnt believe it. And, at the best, its creating only about 100,000 jobs a month less than half of whats necessary to bring the country back to 5 percent unemployment in 10 years.
The president, most of his allies in Congress and liberal outside economists also devout believers in John Maynard Keynes demand side economics think that more spending is the answer, plus some targeted tax cuts.
But, by 51 percent to 40 percent, according to a just-released Pew poll, the public prefers reducing the federal deficit to spending more on job creation.
Republicans are relying on that kind of polling to say no to new spending, or at least to demand that any outlays be offset with other budget cuts.
Enough conservative and moderate Democrats or just nervous ones are of the same opinion that theres no chance of getting big spending through Congress, even if economists such as Paul Krugman and Alan Blinder of Princeton University, Columbia Universitys Joseph Stiglitz, and Robert Reich of the University of California, Berkeley, say its necessary to ward off a 1930s-style economic failure.
So, what should Obama do? He should do as Harvard economist N. Gregory Mankiw recommends: have some intellectual humility and see if something else might work namely, tax cuts.
Mankiw was President George W. Bushs former chief economic adviser, but writing in the current issue of the journal National Affairs he does not come off as a doctrinaire supply side ideologue.
Rather, he admits that economists and policymakers have no way of knowing for sure if their economic models are correct in coping with a crisis.