A coalition well-stacked with Googles corporate enemies is building a case on Capitol Hill this week against an anticipated court decision that would allow the search giant to publish millions of library books on the Internet.
As people begin to understand the complexities of this settlement and the ramifications that it would have, they are beginning to understand that the issues really deserve broad legislative treatment, said Peter Brantley, a co-founder of the coalition, the Open Book Alliance. Increasing access to digital books ... could be achieved in a public fashion that would make books commonly available, not just to one private company.
In addition to library groups, Brantleys organization includes Googles high-tech archrivals Microsoft, Yahoo and retailer Amazon.com, whose investment in the popular Kindle digital book platform could be undercut by the likely free offerings of Google.
On Tuesday, Brantley met with House Judiciary Committee staffers on a possible legislative response to an expected ruling by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York next month.
The court on Feb. 18 will decide the fate of a class action lawsuit involving Google and the publishing industry over copyright concerns related to the companys Books project, an ongoing effort to digitize millions of books. Since its launch in 2004, the project has hit a slew of complicated legal snags involving out-of-print books and orphan works, whose ownership is unknown.
The vast majority of presumptively copyrighted works have no identifiable owner because copyright has become so long, and theres no formalities attached to it, Harvard Law School professor Lawrence Lessig said.
To ward off a protracted court battle, Google cut a potential deal with authors and publishers in October 2008, a settlement that now awaits court action and would open up millions of these books to students and readers across the U.S., according to Googles Web site.
Google also claims that the deal will set up a compensation system to pay publishing companies and authors. The terms of the settlement also include provisions allowing the blind and others with visual impairments to convert the books to audio files or other accessible formats.
Right now, there are not a lot of distributors of books who are making their products accessible to blind people, said Chris Danielsen, a spokesman for the National Federation of the Blind, which supports the settlement. E-books should be inherently accessible to blind people because theyre just computer files, [but] since various distributors have them tied to one device like the Kindle we dont have access to those e-books and thats a problem.
Google hopes to be a major player in the book market and would have content that is accessible to us, Danielsen added.
A Google spokesman defended the settlement late last week, saying it would create a publishing marketplace. So far, the spokesman said, Google has scanned more than 12 million books and is uncertain who owns the rights to about 1 million.