House Democratic Retirements: Trickle Could Lead to Wave
Special to Roll Call
During the fall, as President Barack Obamas approval ratings started to drop, rumblings began that Democrats were in danger of losing a big part of the majority they won in the House in November 2006 and bolstered just last year.
At the time, these prognostications were premature in great part because Democrats were well-insulated by the utter lack of retirements among their Members. Without retirements, the GOP can have no real hope of making huge gains. Winning back seats with an incumbent running for re-election is difficult because even first-term or red-district Democrats have large war chests, requiring the National Republican Congressional Committee to spend considerable money to flip each seat. The lack of retirements has been the largest obstacle to the Republicans making a comeback.
But things have changed in a hurry. In quick succession, four Democrats in even or Republican districts have announced their retirements Rep. Dennis Moore in Kansas 3rd district, Rep. John Tanner in Tennessees 8th, Rep. Brian Baird in Washingtons 3rd, and, most recently, Rep. Bart Gordon in Tennessees 6th putting three seats at risk of flipping to the GOP, with Gordons seat a near-lock to switch.
Gordons loss is particularly shocking since he won easily last year and is chairman of a full committee. But his district went drastically to the right last year, with its Partisan Voting Index jumping to R+13 from R+4, according to the Cook Political Report.
These retirements constitute the Democrats worst nightmare, as the partys ability to hold the line was their firewall to extensive losses in 2010.
Using a simple five-point checklist of questions, we can attempt to forecast some of the next Members who could retire from seats that could then become competitive:
1. Seniority. Given that newer Members are likely to stick around, was the Member elected before 2004?
2. District PVI. Is the score D+3 or less?
3. Electoral Problems. Could the incumbent face a tough race in 2010, or is he or she in a district that will never be safe?
4. Committees. Is the Member either not on an A-committee Appropriations, Energy and Commerce, Rules, or Ways and Means, or even if they are, do they have little hope of ever attaining a gavel?
5. Age. Is the Member older than 65, or otherwise dealing with age or health-related issues?
Using these questions, we will highlight 10 Democratic Members who have at least some of these characteristics, and six bellwethers whose retirements, while unlikely, would portend terribly for the Democrats:
Rep. Marion Berry (Arkansas 1st district; R+8; elected 1996). Berry ran unopposed last year, but he watched as Arkansas lurched to the right, with his district going from D+1 to R+8 in one year; additionally, he will be 68 years old next year.
Rep. Leonard Boswell (Iowas 3rd; D+1; elected 1996). Boswell will be 76 in 2010, with his chairmanship of the Agriculture Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities and Risk Management his greatest impetus for hanging in for another term; he is not positioned to ever chair the full committee.
Rep. Lincoln Davis (Tennessees 4th; R+13; elected 2002). The entire state of Tennessee took a hard turn to the right last year, and while Davis won comfortably last year, at 66 and with no seniority on his committees (though he is on Appropriations), there are rumors that Davis could demur should an energetic Republican challenger materialize. Davis told Roll Call this week that he will seek re-election.
Rep. Bob Etheridge (North Carolinas 2nd; R+2; elected 1996). Etheridge, a low-key Member who decided against a Senate run next year, does have more than $1 million on hand and chairs an Agriculture subcommittee, but he will be 69 years old in 2010 and has little hope of ever chairing the full committee.
Potts: Congress Must Not Allow Lobbying Efforts to Block Pro-Consumer Financial Planning Bill
March 18, 12:35 p.m.
Quietly hidden amid debates over which agency should house a consumer financial protection agency is a simple consumer financial protection proposal. It would safeguard Main Street residents from malpractice by people claiming to be financial planners. Read Full Article











