- Edwards Releases Senate Fundraising Totals
- Academics Say Higher Education Prepared Them for Higher Office
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: The Mountain Region
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: New England
- Top Races in 2016: The Midwest
Activist shareholders are pressuring companies such as Nike to pull out of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, arguing that the trade groups stance against climate change legislation is incompatible with the companies own positions.
Green Century Funds, Newground Social Investment and others sent letters to Nike CEO Mark Parker, urging the company to go beyond its decision Wednesday to step down from the chambers board of directors.
Its a very positive step and a clear indication the chambers recalcitrant position is not supported by its members, Green Century Funds Emily Stone said about Nikes stepping down from the chambers board. At the same time, we will continue to urge Nike to leave the chamber.
Green Century Funds holds more than 3,300 shares of Nike stock.
Walden Asset Management, which owns more than 500,000 shares of Nike stock as a division of Boston Trust & Investment Management Co., sent a similar letter to Nike on Wednesday.
The Chambers position and active voice on climate change is especially embarrassing for numerous members who are proactive leaders on reducing greenhouse gases and limiting the negative impact on climate change, Walden Senior Vice President Timothy Smith wrote.
Nike spokeswoman Erin Dobson said the letters from shareholder groups did not play a part in the companys decision to withdraw from the chambers board of directors.
Nike had been trying to work with the chamber to change its position on climate change for nearly a year, Dobson said. Last week, Nike publicly confronted the chamber on its stance before deciding to leave the board but remain a member of the group.
We believe that on the issue of climate change the Chamber has not represented the diversity of perspective held by the board of directors, Nike said in a statement. We will continue our membership to advocate for climate change legislation inside the committee structure and believe that we can better influence policy by being part of the conversation.
Nike, which said it would continue to evaluate its membership with the association, is just the latest chamber member to take heat from shareholders.
The unrest over the chambers policy on climate change has been brewing for the past year as several members have started pro-climate change coalitions, including the Business for Innovative Climate and Energy Policy and the U.S. Climate Action Partnership.
The chamber has also seen three large utilities Chicago-based Exelon Corp.; Californias Pacific Gas & Electric; and PNM Resources, a holding company with New Mexico ties exit in the past two weeks.
Environmental activists and union officials are trying to use Nikes stepping down from the board and the recent defections to drive other companies to do the same.
The Center for Political Accountability and more than a dozen of its shareholder activist groups wrote 25 members of BICEP, USCAP, the National Association of Manufacturers and the chamber in May, raising the discrepancy between the companies position on climate change and that of NAM and the chamber. The group followed up with another letter in June, asking the companies to tell the associations to disclose their disagreement on climate change on the associations Web sites and to refund a portion of the companies dues, CPAs founder Bruce Freed said.