Feb. 12, 2016 SIGN IN | REGISTER

Blue Dogs Nip at Pelosi’s Plan

Tom Williams/Roll Call
Speaker Nancy Pelosi is facing fresh resistance from Caucus moderates who are unhappy with her plans to move a liberal health care bill through the chamber.

“What she supports, which is the Progressive [Caucus] plan, the robust public option, is the one that saves money,” said Congressional Progressive Caucus Co-Chairwoman Lynn Woolsey (D-Calif.). “We don’t need to tax employee benefit plans.”

Leaders of that group have been whipping their members to get firm commitments on voting against any bill that does not include what they have termed a “robust” public option. They were set to meet Wednesday evening to compare notes on their whip counts. “It’s going very, very well,” Progressive Caucus Co-Chairman Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.) said.

Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) said no decision has been made on what will be included in the final bill, although he acknowledged a desire to get it done quickly to give the Congressional Budget Office time to score it. Waxman wouldn’t venture to say whether the bill would be tied to Medicare rates, but he said a public insurance option would be in the bill.

“It’s hard to believe we would have a trigger because we have such strong support for a public option,” he said. “A trigger is not a public option, it’s the possibility of a public option.”

Meanwhile, freshman Reps. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) and Jared Polis (D-Colo.) said they have continued to push to shrink or eliminate a surcharge on the wealthy to pay for the bill.

“We met with [Pelosi’s] staff as recently as last night,” Connolly said. He and Polis said they would prefer to raise money by using Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus’ (D-Mont.) plan to tax insurance companies that offer high-end insurance plans. Baucus’ plan, which calls for a nonprofit health insurance cooperatives rather than a public option, is being marked up by his committee and could head to the Senate floor as early as next week.

Connolly noted the Senate has already said the surcharge is dead on arrival, and President Barack Obama omitted any mention of it when he delivered a joint address to Congress earlier this month. And while Connolly, who used to work as a Capitol Hill staffer, said he understands the desire of leadership to have a negotiating position going into conference, the issue is a difficult one for the party’s majority makers. “For people in competitive and marginal districts, that’s a whole different problem,” he said.

He said freshman and sophomore Democrats have already taken a series of tough votes this Congress, whether they be on the stimulus package or the cap-and-trade bill. “This is not a bunch of weak-kneed, lily-livered, afraid-of-their-own-shadow freshmen,” he said.

Democratic leaders stressed that no final decisions have been made. At least one acknowledged the difficulty of scoping the shifting attitudes among Members. “I can’t quite get a feel yet for where it is we’re going to go,” Democratic Caucus Chairman John Larson (Conn.) said. “Every day unfolds a little different wrinkle and a little bit more momentum one way or the other.”

Fresh evidence of that came Wednesday evening, when Herseth Sandlin said she sensed new movement back toward compromise on the public insurance option. “In my estimation, there is a growing chorus of pragmatism,” she said.

comments powered by Disqus




Want Roll Call on your doorstep?