Watchdog groups are seizing on the recent edict by House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) to extend the one-year lobbying ban for a former top staffer as a way to push Congress to revise lobbying rules to expand the cooling-off period for Members of Congress and senior staffers headed to K Street.
Clearly whats going on here is Barney Frank understands hes dealing with an extremely sweeping and controversial issue, Public Citizens Craig Holman said. Hes trying to avoid having it tainted by the revolving door.
Holman said he would like Congress to expand the lobbying ban for lawmakers and senior staff in the House to two years.
Democracy 21s Fred Wertheimer also supports increasing the lobbying ban.
Revolving-door problems are real and cause public credibility problems about the way government decisions are made, and there continues to be a need to strengthen the revolving provisions in the House, Wertheimer said.
Lawmakers considered broadening the lobbying ban for House Members to two years, but the provision was ultimately dropped from the final version of the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act that passed in 2007. The bill did increase the cooling-off period for Senators to two years.
Frank issued a memo last week stating that Michael Paese, a former top staffer on the committee, will be barred from communicating with the Democratic Members of the Financial Services panel until the end of the Congressional term next year.
Paese heads Goldman Sachs Washington, D.C., lobbying office. His statutory lobbying ban expired on Sept. 11.
Paese did not return calls Friday, but a Goldman Sachs spokesman said,We clearly respect Chairman Franks desire that he be recused for longer.
Franks decision comes as Congress is about to embark on legislation that is expected to bring the most sweeping regulatory changes Wall Street has seen in decades.
Frank spokesman Steven Adamske said that extending the lobbying ban to Paese is an isolated action and not part of a broader effort on lobbying reform.
Were in a period of updating the regulations and doing a whole regulatory reform and wanted to act out of an abundance of caution so that nobody has any undue influence, Adamske said.
Still, the measure is unusual.
While lobbyists who are married to staffers often recuse themselves from lobbying their spouse and the office they work in, ethics lawyers said they had never seen a Member of Congress officially extend the lobbying moratorium.
The move isnt one that K Street is excited about. Lobbyists say they are worried that other Members of Congress may decide to take similar action on an ad hoc basis.
Its one more hurdle that lobbyists are having to deal with, and it may open the door to additional restrictions to Capitol Hill, said Ken Gross, an ethics lawyer at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom.
Still, Gross said he doubted it would lead Congress to overhaul the lobbying laws to include a longer cooling-off period.
It was definitely looked at, thought about, negotiated, and it came out to one year, he said.
Franks decision to bar Paese from lobbying Democratic Members of the Financial Services panel was done in consultation with Paese, according to a lobbyist familiar with the situation.