With the BP spill generating a gush of legislation, lobbyists for the energy industry, trial lawyers and environmental groups are scrambling to tweak bill language and either slow down or nudge forward measures aimed at tightening federal oversight of drilling.
Democratic leaders have instructed committee chairmen to prepare spill-related proposals by the July Fourth recess, and more than half a dozen Senate and House panels have scheduled hearings today to consider bills ranging from lifting liability limits to increasing oil rig inspections.
It really is an onslaught, said Dan Naatz, vice president of federal relations for the Independent Petroleum Association of America. His team of four lobbyists has parked on Capitol Hill to field questions from staff and lawmakers.
Its been a full-court press, Naatz said. The groups membership includes Anadarko, a minority partner in the BP oil well that has since blamed the larger oil company for problems on the project.
As with many in the oil industry, the IPAA opposes legislation that would eliminate the $75 million cap on damages for oil spills included in the 1990 oil pollution act. The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee is expected to consider a proposal today to lift the caps, a measure supported by Chairman Barbara Boxer.
The law should be clear that the polluter pays for the damage they cause. Period, the California Democrat said at a recent hearing on the proposal.
But industry officials have argued that such a change would prove financially ruinous.
Legislation resulting in unlimited liability for offshore accidents will devastate many offshore exploration and production companies, Burt Adams, chairman of the National Ocean Industries Association, said in a recent statement. NOIAs membership includes the major companies involved in BPs Deepwater Horizon project, including Transocean, which owned the rig, Halliburton, which cemented the well, and Cameron, which made the faulted piece of machinery called the blowout preventer that is designed to prevent a well explosion.
The oil industry has taken a more nuanced approach to another measure dealing with federal oversight of drilling that will be considered today by the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.
The bill, co-sponsored by Chairman Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) and ranking member Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), would increase financial security and safety requirements and penalties for violations as well as lengthen the time for environmental reviews. It would also reorganize the former Minerals Management Service into two entities, separating the royalty collection from leasing responsibilities. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar is already proceeding with a similar restructuring of the agency now renamed the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.
A spokeswoman for the American Petroleum Institute, which represents large oil companies including BP, said that while the industry supports the intent of the legislation, it has qualms about some of the details.
Our concern is some of the provisions would create uncertainty in the process, APIs Cathy Landry said. For example, she said one provision would allow the secretary of the Interior to determine that an offshore area was too geographically challenging after it had approved the lease and an oil company had already invested a considerable amount on the project.
While the API has not taken a position on the Senate legislation, it has opposed a similar but more comprehensive bill in the House sponsored by Rep. Nick Rahall (D-W.Va.), chairman of the Natural Resources Committee.
The bill, which will be reviewed today by Rahalls committee, also calls for agency reorganization and would extend the 30-day deadline for review of exploration plans to 90 days and require monthly oil rig inspections. The measure, portions of which were drafted well before the Gulf oil spill, calls for toughened standards for onshore energy leasing programs and overhauling federal oil royalty collection programs.
But in direct response to the current environmental disaster, it would also establish a Gulf of Mexico restoration plan, which has been championed by environmental groups who have been heavily lobbying Congress since the spill.
Soon after the April 20 rig explosion, a number of environmental groups banded together to come up with legislative proposals. We put together a list of principles that we shared with Senate and House staff, said Athan Manuel, director of lands protection for the Sierra Club.
In the past two weeks, Manuel said, the green groups, which include the Ocean Conservancy, the National Resources Defense Council and the Alaska Wilderness League, have been e-mailing Congressional staff and holding more meetings on Capitol Hill. He said the relevant committees took our concerns very seriously.
The trial lawyers, represented by the American Association for Justice, have also been busy promoting changes to liability laws and have escorted families of victims to Congressional hearings.
In particular, the AAJ has been pushing a measure that would amend the Death on the High Seas Act, which was enacted in 1920 and limits how much money families of those who die off the U.S. shore can recover.
The Senate Commerce Committee today is expected to review legislation by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) that would allow families to be paid for noneconomic damages resulting from death on the sea. The witnesses at that hearing include Natalie Roshto of Liberty, Miss., the widow of Shane Roshto, who died on the Deepwater Horizon. The House Judiciary Committee has already approved a similar bill.
The wave of legislation has made it hard for outside groups, even those with sizable lobbying shops, to keep up. The House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Energy and Environment today is considering a bill that would stiffen oversight of the blowout preventer, whose failure has been blamed as the major problem on the BP rig.
The legislation would direct federal officials to determine that the blowout preventer and other well-control equipment will prevent a blowout from occurring.
The APIs Landry said her group was still reviewing the legislation.