- Edwards Releases Senate Fundraising Totals
- Academics Say Higher Education Prepared Them for Higher Office
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: The Mountain Region
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: New England
- Top Races in 2016: The Midwest
House Democratic leaders expressed confidence that they will have the support to move forward as soon as today with a campaign finance package that has taken intense fire this week after its drafters exempted the National Rifle Association from new disclosure requirements.
Democratic leaders are in a hurry to pass the measure before campaign season hits full tilt. The package would roll back a Supreme Court ruling earlier this year, which lifted limits on corporate and union political spending by forcing groups participating in elections to name their top donors.
The deal with the gun lobby, which leaders deemed critical for garnering make-or-break support from pro-gun Democrats, has set off a cascade of denunciations from lawmakers and outside groups across the ideological spectrum.
Democratic leaders were hustling to contain the fallout on Wednesday. Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) and Assistant to the Speaker Chris Van Hollen (Md.), the measures architect, held an afternoon huddle with liberal Democrats to sell the compromise as a necessary and relatively harmless step to salvage the package.
They appeared to convince at least some skeptical liberals. Its something thats bearable and you gotta do. Its the price of passing the bill, Rep. Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.) said after the meeting. And Rep. Jared Polis (Colo.), a co-sponsor of the original bill, said even with the amendment, the measure was far better than the status quo.
But others signaled the deal had soured them on the overall package, and they were now considering opposing it. Its hard for me to envision how you do a bill thats designed to protect against special interest influence and create a protection for a special interest, Rep. Donna Edwards (Md.) said.
Democratic aides and officials with left-leaning outside groups also carped that party leaders had engineered a carve-out for a group that, for the most part, supports Republicans. The NRAs political action committee directed 78 percent of its contributions or about $860,000 to Republicans in the 2008 election cycle. And it has since favored the minority with 71 percent of its contributions, or about $336,000, through the end of April. Youre talking about passing into law a bill of attainder for the NRA a private bill to benefit them, one House Democratic chief of staff said. Why in the hell are we doing that?
And two days after that deal was announced, new voices from both the public and private sectors spoke up to pan it. A letter to Pelosi from a long list of left-leaning nonprofit groups, including the League of Conservation Voters, the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Sierra Club, pledged to oppose the package in its current form. It is inappropriate and inequitable to create a two-tiered system of campaign finance laws and First Amendment protections, one for the most powerful and influential and another for everyone else, the letter read.
And a powerhouse roster of industry trade groups including the National Association of Home Builders, the National Association of Manufacturers, the National Federation of Independent Business and the National Restaurant Association wrote House Members, arguing the bill is an unconstitutional attempt to silence business and advantage labor. The groups called the bill a direct attack on the rights of the business community and the role our organizations play in the national political dialogue.