The massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is causing a rift among once-friendly downtown trade associations that are now at odds over whose members caused the disaster.
Longtime allies such as the American Petroleum Institute, the International Association of Drilling Contractors and the National Ocean Industries Association are circling the wagons to protect their biggest dues-paying companies until more details about the accident emerge, one of the groups told Roll Call on Wednesday.
Were keeping ourselves a little bit at arms length until we know more, said Brian Petty, a spokesman for the drillers group IADC.
Prior to the spill, Petty described his trade associations relationship with API as very close.
The three trade groups represent the complex overlay of oil companies, contractors, equipment makers and service firms needed to pump oil from thousands of feet below the ocean floor.
In the case of BPs Deepwater Horizon, which sank two weeks ago, the gasoline retailer actually contracted much of its operations with Transocean, a Houston-based drilling firm whose employees also manned the platform. Another company, Cameron International, made the safety valve that apparently failed initially to stop the leak, while Halliburton employees poured concrete on the job site, sources said.
According to its website, APIs membership includes three of the companies: BP America, Halliburton and Cameron International. A NOIA spokeswoman confirmed that all four companies are members, while Transocean is the only one of the four companies with full membership in IADC, the drillers website shows.
API is going to be loath to step out in front of BP, Petty said. British Petroleum is such a huge member of API, API is not going to do anything to compromise BPs position. BP has been pointing fingers at Transocean, BP has been pointing fingers at Halliburton, BP has been pointing fingers at Cameron, trying to hive off the blame.
And the National Ocean Industries Association? Petty continued. Similarly, theyve got Transocean as a member but also BP, so BP has kind of kept a boot on their neck.
A BP spokesman did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday. API and NOIA both denied that interaction among the groups is deteriorating.
API spokeswoman Cathy Landry disputed a claim that API is only looking out for BPs interests in the aftermath of the Gulf of Mexico spill.
We are not carrying anybodys water, she said.
With the well still flowing Wednesday, Landry said all of APIs members have roughly the same interests.
Our goal is to one, stop this spill; two, clean it up; and three, find out what went wrong and implement policies and practices to further improve our industries, she said.
Counting all four of the companies as members, NOIA is undoubtedly sorting through its own thick internal morass involving how to triage its often-conflicted members lobbying strategies.
In an interview, NOIA spokeswoman Nicolette Nye also denied there is dissension internally or on K Street among the three trade associations. Regarding her organization, she said the association is standing by our member companies.