Fresh off their victory on a controversial health care overhaul, House Democrats are preparing to wade into a potentially divisive social debate over whether to ban employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Democrats behind the push, led by House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.), one of three openly gay Members, are already surveying their ranks to determine support for the measure, with the aim of approving it by the end of May.
The House cleared a version of the legislation in 2007 with a wide margin padded by support from 35 Republicans. But that bill did not extend employment protections to transgender people, after proponents determined they couldnt wrangle majority backing for that approach.
This time, Democratic leaders are committed to pursuing a discrimination ban that includes transgender people, lawmakers and staff said. And they believe that rapidly shifting politics surrounding gay rights, nudged along on the transgender issue by an aggressive lobbying campaign by advocates, will help them win the day. But the push faces resistance from a so-far-unknown number of Democrats, mostly from rural, socially conservative districts. Many of these lawmakers are eager to avoid what they consider a tough vote pitting a sizable chunk of their constituency against base voters and wealthy donors in an already challenging re-election environment.
The fact that the measure passed the House last Congress without the transgender provision helps our Members understand that this is not toxic, because nobody that I know of lost any race because of it, Frank said. Secondly, we have done some education on the transgender issue, which we hadnt done before. Two years ago, he said, the matter was too new.
But one House Republican leadership aide said Democrats are proceeding with the ban, officially the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, at their own political peril. The fact that the Democrat leadership are about to make 60-plus vulnerable Members vote for transgendered protections shows just how out of touch Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi [D-Calif.] is with the reality facing these Members, this aide said, predicting the provision would prompt the majority to lose the support of Republicans who backed it in the last Congress.
The broader version of the bill, introduced in June by Frank, has gathered 199 co-sponsors, including six Republicans support that the measures backers pointed to in making the case it is already close to clearing the 216-vote hurdle needed for passage. We feel confident that we have the majority, said Allison Herwitt, legislative director for the Human Rights Campaign, which has helped coordinate lobbying for a discrimination ban extended to include gender identity. The Speaker is interested in looking at, after the health care vote and after the recess, is everybody in the same place?
That effort started this week, as an informal whip team divided up names of rank-and-file Democrats to survey. It includes Frank and the two other openly gay Members, Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) and Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.). Rep. Joe Crowley (N.Y.), another member of that team in addition to being a chief deputy whip and a vice chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee said he understands the vote will still cause heartburn in some corners of the Democratic Caucus. I dont know if its ever the right time to do some of the more difficult things, he said. I do think this is the right thing to do and it ought to be done.
Roll Call has launched a new feature, Hill Navigator, to advise congressional staffers and would-be staffers on how to manage workplace issues on Capitol Hill. Please send us your questions anything from office etiquette, to handling awkward moments, to what happens when the work life gets too personal. Submissions will be treated anonymously.