- Academics Say Higher Education Prepared Them for Higher Office
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: The Mountain Region
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: New England
- Top Races in 2016: The Midwest
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: The Plains Region
A recent decision by international lenders to underwrite a new South African power plant is setting off a fight among interest groups and Members of Congress, who are at odds over whether the coal-fired facility will help or pollute the developing nation.
The World Bank agreed Thursday to loan $3.1 billion to a South African utility company, Eskom, to put the finishing touches on its coal-fired plant in Lephalale. The institution also is lending Eskom $260 million for a wind-energy project and $485 million for low-carbon energy efficiency components, including a railway to transport coal with fewer greenhouse gas emissions, the World Bank said in a statement.
The banks leaders added that the loan will help the poor, AIDS-ravaged country. According to the CIA, roughly one-quarter of the South African population is unemployed, and 50 percent live below the poverty level.
Without an increased energy supply, South Africans will face hardship for the poor and limited economic growth, World Bank Vice President Obiageli Ezekwesili said after the loan was approved. Access to energy is essential for fighting poverty and catalyzing growth, both in South Africa and the wider subregion.
But following the World Bank vote last week, Members were quick to argue that the loan is not a cure-all for South Africas energy and economic woes. Citing environmental concerns, Senate Foreign Relations Chairman John Kerry (D-Mass.) criticized the loan, saying, There are better ways to promote urgent energy access in the developing world without exacerbating the looming threat of catastrophic climate change, which will ultimately hit Africa and the developing world the hardest.
Moving forward, the World Bank should be leading the way by leveraging its funding and broad expertise to promote new, low carbon footprint energy sources that mitigate climate change, Kerry said in a statement.
Late last month, a bicameral coalition led by Kerry lodged concerns with World Bank President Robert Zoellick over proposed financing for what may become one of the worlds largest coal-fired plants. On March 26, Kerry, Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) signed a letter urging Zoellick to scrap the loan, which they said does not meet World Bank standards for procurement or acceptable standards for environmental impact assessments of associated facilities.
Ten days later, Zoellick wrote back to inform the lawmakers that the bank was moving forward with the loan.
We have conducted due diligence on all aspects of the project and have concluded that the projects development and poverty reduction merits, along with the need to support South Africa in meeting its energy crisis, should lead us to submit the project to our board of executive directors for their consideration, the former U.S. trade representative and deputy secretary of State under President George W. Bush wrote.
Meanwhile, as lawmakers and Zoellick squabbled over environmental concerns, Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.) was leading a faction of Congressional Black Caucus members in support of the loan. Ahead of last weeks World Bank vote, Meeks wrote to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner to express his support for the loan, which he wrote on his Web site will provide economic growth and geopolitical stability in southern Africa.