Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) has been known to say no to party leadership frequently during the libertarian icons 11 terms in the House. But his recent decision to reject the House GOPs earmark ban by requesting 41 projects totaling more than $100 million for his Congressional district may not be excused.
Paul is one of a handful of Members to publicly challenge the House GOP leadership by going forward with earmark requests just two weeks after the Republican Conference adopted a one-year moratorium on the spending practice.
One House Republican leadership aide said their defiance would not be taken lightly.
There will be situations where we have some confusion on how these rules are implemented, but if Members are deliberately breaking the rules, it will be a serious matter and one that the Steering Committee will consider, the leadership aide said.
The Republican Steering Committee determines committee assignments and committee leadership positions.
Paul, ranking member of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology, defended his decision to request projects, saying he needed to make sure his constituents benefited from their federal tax dollars.
He added that he doubted leadership would punish him.
I dont think theyd do that to me, Paul said. I think that they will recognize that they have to be fair.
Paul said leaders were well aware of his opposition to the ban and his belief that earmarks increase transparency because the public can see where their federal dollars are being allocated.
They asked me whether I would sign on to the moratorium, and I said no, it doesnt fit my philosophy because I think we should designate every penny that we spend, he said.
Paul is not alone in his decision to reject the ban.
Several House Republicans projects are included on a list of 2011 earmark requests released by the Appropriations Committee on Wednesday.
Republican Reps. Henry Brown (S.C.), Anh Joseph Cao (La.), Bill Posey (Fla.) and Don Young (Alaska) are among the lawmakers requesting funding for specific projects on the Appropriations Committee list.
Rep. Geoff Davis (R-Ky.) was included on the Appropriations Committee list Wednesday morning, but his name was removed because he wrote letters in support of programs but did not request any specific funding, thus the requests do not count as earmarks.
Clayton Hall, Caos chief of staff, said House Republican leadership knew of Caos objection to the new rule and should not be surprised by his requests.
Congressman Cao disagrees with their decision, and he refuses to stop fighting for projects that will help his district recover from the storms, Hall said. We submitted earmark requests and will work with Members on both sides of the aisle to secure money for local education initiatives, storm protection projects, economic development, and to fight crime (among others).
Caos Web site said he is accepting earmark requests, but no specific projects are listed.
Don Young told an Alaska newspaper shortly after the ban was imposed that he would not adhere to it.
I am elected to serve my constituents, and as long as they continue to request federal funding for their projects of interest, then I will continue to do my best to accommodate them, Young said in a statement.