- Why Was Fiorina Denied Ad Time During the Debate?
- What the Hell Happened to Jeb Bush?
- Pelosi, DCCC Use Tea Party to Fire Up Dem Voters
- Anti-Abortion Groups to GOP: Include Fiorina in Debate
- Obamacare Repeal Votes Motivate Democratic Donors
House Democrats and Republicans have begun separate internal debates over whether to implement a one-year moratorium on earmarks but rarely has the climb to the political high ground been so slow.
While a handful of lawmakers have sworn off the practice of inserting pet projects for their districts into appropriations bills, both sides of the aisle have so far rejected the idea of a strict moratorium.
But some opponents of earmarks hope the recent public backlash over spending in Washington will give their push new momentum.
Rep. Jeb Hensarling (Texas), who spent most of his two-year tenure as chairman of the House Republican Study Committee fighting for a moratorium, said through a spokesman, The momentum is all behind changing the culture of spending even though earmark spending totals less than 1 percent of the federal budget.
Rep. Jeff Flake (Ariz.) is asking his fellow House Republicans to sign a petition that would force a vote in the Conference on a yearlong moratorium for GOP Members before Democrats lay claim to being the anti-earmark champions.
I warned my leadership for years that we could be outflanked on this, he said in an interview on Monday. I think Democrats have seen the writing on the wall.
Flake said if Republicans adopt the moratorium it was unlikely that Democrats would continue the earmarking process without Republican projects.
Can you imagine the grief they would take? Flake said.
During a meeting of the Republican Study Committee last week, Flake began circulating the petition, which calls for Republicans to adopt an earmark ban before the March 19 deadline for submitting appropriations requests.
A Flake spokesman said the Arizona Republican already has 17 of the 50 Republican signatures necessary to force the Conference to meet and discuss the moratorium.
House Republican leaders have tried several times over the past few years to implement a short-term moratorium on earmarks, but their efforts failed to gain support from the majority of the Conference.
In December 2008, Minority Leader John Boehner (Ohio) created a Republican Earmark Reform Committee and tasked them to develop standards and policies for House Republicans.
The 10-Member committee never released a report because they could not agree on a set of recommendations.
Democratic leaders will likely face similar problems.
Last week, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) privately discussed with her leadership the idea of an earmark moratorium, according to sources with knowledge of the discussions. However, Democratic leaders have yet to vet the idea broadly with their rank and file or even with Appropriations Chairman David Obey (D-Wis.).
The plan would likely meet aggressive pushback from some corners. Some will likely argue that in such a perilous political environment, endangered incumbents can ill afford to give up on delivering the projects for the sake of what will amount to a talking point.
And many Members in both parties view targeted spending as a constitutionally protected privilege.
Flake said that Republicans would miss a huge political opportunity if Democrats were the first to forsake earmarks.
The ability to direct 1 percent of the budget isnt worth the grief, Flake argued. It may be unfair, but 99 percent of the problem is perception that the process is corrupt.