The good news is that, now that Democrats have won total control of the government, all Americans are likely to have health insurance.
The bad news is that the ranks of the uninsured, previously about 46 million, probably will swell by another 5 million to 6 million because of the recession, and a similar number will be added to strained public programs such as Medicaid and SCHIP.
That means the cost of covering everyone will surge far above previous estimates which were probably low to begin with of $150 billion a year.
Health reform plans advanced by President-elect Barack Obama, incoming Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Daschle and Congressional leaders such as Sens. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Max Baucus (D-Mont.) contain no certain cost-saving mechanism and specifically exclude the one advocated by Republicans: choice-making by individual patient-consumers.
So, it wouldnt be surprising if the 10-year cost of providing insurance to all who need it could be far more than $3 trillion, the figure some conservatives put on buying
federal-employee-quality coverage for 45 million people.
And more bad news lies in the likelihood that Democrats will adopt a government-heavy health reform solution that might eventually result in the disappearance of private health insurance.
No one is seriously advocating imposing a Canadian-style, government-run, single-payer system in one fell swoop, but creation of a Medicare-like option for all Americans could lead to that result, especially if government policy drives up the cost of private insurance.
Moreover, Democrats such as Rep. Pete Stark (Calif.) want to revive the Clinton-era proposal of allowing people 55 and older to buy into Medicare, another step toward Canadian-style medicine.
Advocates say that Medicare is more efficient than private insurance, but the fact is, the Medicare system is scheduled to go broke by 2018, and seniors express high satisfaction with one part of Medicare thats private, Part D, the prescription drug benefit.
Democrats are likely to declare war on pharmaceutical companies, the people whose research produces the drugs that save lives and help people avoid costly chronic care.
Almost certainly, Democrats will require the Medicare system to negotiate prices with drug companies which means, set them and some Democrats favor restricting seniors access to drugs the way the Department of Veterans Affairs does.
The purpose is to hold down Medicare costs, make drugs cheaper for seniors and prevent profiteering by drug companies. But, in the process, research and discoveries will be stifled. And seniors are likely to balk at having their drug choices restricted.
But back to the good news. Because Democrats won control of Congress so handily, the partisan warfare that has blocked health care reform for decades is over.
When Obama takes office Jan. 20, Democrats plan to have passed for his signature the expansion of the State Childrens Health Insurance Program twice vetoed by President George W. Bush. It will cover 3.5 million of the 10 million uninsured children.
The economic recovery package he signs that day is also likely to contain money to help states bear the cost of providing Medicaid to low-income people a number estimated to rise by 1 million for every 1 percent increase in unemployment.
Obama has said he wants energy and environmental legislation to be his and Congress second order of business, but Daschle reportedly is pushing for health reform to take priority. So is Kennedy, who is suffering from incurable brain cancer and wants universal health insurance to be his legacy.
Roll Call has launched a new feature, Hill Navigator, to advise congressional staffers and would-be staffers on how to manage workplace issues on Capitol Hill. Please send us your questions anything from office etiquette, to handling awkward moments, to what happens when the work life gets too personal. Submissions will be treated anonymously.