Jurors Given Two Portraits of Stevens

Related Content

• Stevens’ Defense Has Political Downsides
• Sides Wade Into Jury Pool
• Stevens Will be Excused from Trial to Vote
• Jury Selection Begins Today for Stevens
• Stevens Wins Bid to Review Witness’s Medical Records

Print

E-Mail

Reprints

Text Size

Latest News

• Despite Ailing Mother, Baucus Will Return for Saturday Vote
• White House Strongly Backs Reid’s Health Reform Bill
• GOP Leaders Press Obama on Afghanistan
• Levin Says Panel May Have to Punt on ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’
• Hoffman to Decide About N.Y. Challenge This Weekend

In the first federal trial of a sitting U.S. Senator in more than 27 years, federal prosecutors Thursday depicted Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens (R) as a savvy career politician who surreptitiously accepted valuable gifts, while Stevens’ attorney decried the accusations as misconstrued and placed the blame for any wrongdoing on a prime government witness.

Stevens is charged with seven counts of filing false statements over an eight-year period to conceal the receipt of more than $250,000 in gifts — primarily renovations to his home in Girdwood, Alaska — from the now-defunct VECO oil services firm. He has pleaded not guilty.

In opening arguments Thursday morning, federal prosecutors and Stevens’ defense offered divergent depictions of Stevens himself, as well as the overhaul of his Alaska home and his relationship with former VECO Chief Executive Officer Bill Allen.

“This is a simple case about a public official who took hundreds and thousands dollars worth of free financial benefits, and then took away the public’s right to know that information,” federal prosecutor Brenda Morris told jurors, asserting that Stevens repeatedly filed financial disclosure forms that failed to list those benefits.

“This public official, the defendant did these things so that the free financial benefits he was receiving wouldn’t stop and the public would never have to know.”

“This case is about concealment ... [of] things that the defendant received from friends and benefactors, who were the powerful,” she added.

Defense attorney Brendan Sullivan later countered in his opening remarks: “The man is honest. He would not intentionally violate the law.”

During the proceedings, Stevens, dressed in a dark suit sporting an American flag lapel pin, blue shirt and dark blue tie, remained seated next to Sullivan.

In hourlong remarks, Morris said the government will lay out its case by illustrating what Stevens allegedly received, how much he knew about those gifts and his alleged efforts to conceal those items.

“The government’s evidence will demonstrate that the defendant clearly knows how to get things done with little said,” Morris said, adding that the Senator trusts few individuals but “those he does are very, very loyal to him.”

Morris offered short biographies of expected key witnesses, including longtime Stevens friends Bob Persons, who oversaw the renovation, and Bob Penney, a real estate developer, as well as Allen.

“Bill Allen is not perfect. In fact, he’s a convicted felon. He pled guilty to bribing multiple members of the state Legislature,” Morris acknowledged. Allen is one of eight individuals convicted to date as the result of a federal investigation into state and federal corruption in Alaska.

Morris said the prosecution will detail the renovation project, including work done by VECO employees to design and construct the house.

“You’ll learn that the defendant had ample knowledge that VECO employees were doing significant work at the chalet,” Morris said, then added: But “if you look at those financial disclosures forms, it’s as if VECO was never there.”

The prosecution also alleged that VECO provided subsequent maintenance work on the home, asserting that when Stevens needed an electrician: “We reach for the yellow pages. He reached for VECO.”

In addition to the House, Morris highlighted Stevens’ receipt of a massage chair valued at $2,700, a sled dog and an alleged sweetheart deal on a new car for one of his daughters.

In subsequent remarks, Sullivan characterized the government’s accusations as inaccurate and sought to paint Stevens as an absentee homeowner often subject to the whims of a friend, who at times delivered unwanted gifts and even failed to bill Stevens for the renovation project.

“The evidence will show he is not guilty,” Sullivan said, noting the defense will rely in large part on e-mails sent by Stevens.

“The evidence of intent is found in many, many ways,” Sullivan said, asserting Stevens did not intentionally file false financial statements with the Senate. “In this day and age when we write e-mails, you can read someone’s e-mails and you can get very good insight into what someone was thinking.”