- Republicans Aiming to Register Voters at NASCAR
- Retired Army Colonel to Challenge Stefanik
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: The Southwest
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: Mid-Atlantic States
- Top Congressional Races in 2016: The West
House Republicans on Tuesday called for embattled Ways and Means Chairman Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) to give up his post pending the outcome of multiple ethics investigations, but Democrats dismissed the demand as partisan maneuvering, making it unlikely that the New York lawmaker will forfeit the gavel.
Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) and other leaders made their demand in a letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).
Given Chairman Rangels continuing ethical lapses, he cannot effectively carry out his duties as Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, they wrote.
Thus, in order to remove one obstacle to this Democratic Congress actually addressing and solving working families concerns, you, as the Speaker of the House, must insist that Rep. Rangel step down from his Ways and Means chairmanship pending an investigation of his ethical lapses.
The House ethics committee announced in late July that it had undertaken, at Rangels request, a review of two unrelated matters on his living arrangements and use of rent-controlled apartments in New York City, and his fundraising efforts for a City College facility bearing his name.
According to his attorney Lanny Davis, Rangel planned to submit another formal request to the ethics panel Tuesday night to examine his personal finances, specifically his failure to report rental income of more than $75,000 from a Dominican Republic vacation home on his annual financial disclosure forms or his federal or state income tax filings over a 10-year period.
Davis disparaged Boehners demands as premature, adding that Rangel has also issued a letter to Pelosi explaining the problems related to his Dominican Republic property.
Congressman Boehners rush to judgment, based entirely on innuendo and partisanship, is ironic given his own complaints in past years of Democrats allegedly rushing to judgment, Davis said. Mr. Rangel has asked the ethics committee to look into all of these matters. [The panel] is a bipartisan committee, exactly the opposite of the hyper-partisanship exhibited by the Minority Leader. Mr. Rangel will trust the bipartisan ethics committee to look into the facts involving these issues and to reach an appropriate judgment.
A Pelosi spokesman echoed those sentiments, characterizing the demands as partisan maneuvering.
The American people would be better served if Republicans would stop playing politics and allow the bipartisan ethics committee to do its job, spokesman Nadeam Elshami said. This letter demonstrates that Republican leaders have no confidence in their Members serving on the ethics committee and that they will do anything to divert attention away from the continuing fallout of the Abramoff scandal and the price the Republican Party is continuing to pay for its culture of corruption.
But Boehner spokesman Michael Steel asserted that asking Rangel to step aside while the ethics committee completes its work is not without precedent, citing Democrats removal of Rep. William Jefferson (D-La.) from the same panel in 2006.
Mr. Jefferson was asked to resign from the panel. Were just asking that Mr. Rangel step aside during the investigation, Steel said.
At the time Democrats voted to remove him from his Ways and Means seat, Jefferson was under an ethics investigation but had also been subject to multiple FBI raids. He was indicted in June 2007 on charges of racketeering, bribery and fraud.