Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specters party switch is one of those developments that both reflects the depth of the problems facing the GOP and could begin a new chapter for some Democratic officeholders who will face additional political challenges down the road.
Republican strategists are downright gloomy over the gleeful reaction of conservative activists to Specters exit.
To those conservatives, Specter was never a reliable Republican anyway, and they see his moderate record including his support for the stimulus package and the omnibus appropriations bill, for abortion rights and equal pay, and for a comprehensive solution on immigration reform as diluting the partys brand and empowering Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and President Barack Obama.
But to Republican strategists, many of whom are personally conservative and have major policy differences with Specter, the grass roots reaction to the Senators party switch demonstrates that those activists dont yet recognize the GOPs fundamental problems and therefore arent ready to recruit candidates with broader appeal, particularly in parts of the country that are more liberal on cultural and environmental matters.
Thirty years ago, it was Democrats who imposed a rigid test on abortion, gun control and military spending, dismissing moderate Democrats as insufficiently pure. But party insiders learned their lesson after losing elections they assumed they would win, and the party started recruiting candidates who fit their districts.
The GOP is and will remain a conservative party. But unless its grass-roots activists come to accept the importance of nominating strong candidates who would be strong legislators, the party will be shut out of too many regions to enable it to be the strong national party that it was during the 1980s and 1990s.
Conservative activists dont need to like Specter or agree with all of his votes, but cheering his exit from the party demonstrates that they dont understand the seriousness of their political troubles or how they can rebuild their brand.
But if Specters switch is a headache for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and National Republican Senatorial Committee Chairman John Cornyn (Texas) and it surely is it is potentially an even bigger headache for Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) and dozens of other more moderate House and Senate Democrats who dont agree with their partys liberal wing and depend on the votes of moderate and conservative voters for their political survival.
Lincoln, who could well face a stiff challenge next year, surely would prefer that Republicans block some of the more liberal elements of the Obama/Congressional Democrats agenda, whether on health care, energy or government spending.