Nov. 27, 2015 SIGN IN | REGISTER

Markey Making His Mark

Boucher and Markey both pointed to a recent Environmental Protection Agency announcement — following a pivotal 2007 Supreme Court decision — signaling that it would regulate carbon dioxide as spurring industry interest in getting something done.

“There’s now an understanding that we have to act,” Boucher said. “The EPA is going to regulate it if we don’t.”

Rep. Mike Doyle (D-Pa.), a subcommittee member with steel plants in his district, said there was a lot of fear, especially outside the Beltway, of a bill written by liberals like Markey and Waxman, but Members have been pleasantly surprised by their willingness to accept compromises.

“I have to say that Ed Markey has bent over backwards to be sensitive to the concerns of people like myself,” Doyle said. “I can’t say enough about him. That being said, there’s a long way to go.”

Although Markey and Waxman are pushing for Memorial Day to conclude committee action, it’s not clear what will happen next.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) has hedged on whether the House would move forward first with the cap-and-trade/energy combination measure envisioned by Markey and Waxman or a narrower energy bill that would omit the more controversial cap-and-trade provisions.

And some Members, including Democratic Caucus Chairman John Larson (Conn.), would prefer a flat-out carbon tax instead.

Members also want a better sense of where the Senate will go before moving a bill on the House floor.

“The House is getting a little tired of walking the plank” only to have the Senate refuse to move, Doyle said. “Why put something in a bill that has no chance of passing in the Senate?”

Markey and Waxman also are reaching out to Republicans, intending to meet with them today to present their proposal and get input. But so far, they don’t seem to be getting very far.

“We don’t want to cap our economy and trade away our jobs,” said Rep. John Shimkus (R-Ill.), who hails from coal country and sits on Markey’s subcommittee.

Republican leaders are eyeing the issue with relish, portraying the idea as “cap-and-tax” that will destroy industries, ship jobs overseas, tax everyone who flips on a light switch and do little or nothing to slow global warming. GOP lawmakers saw the energy debate as a winning issue for them in 2008, and are looking to capitalize on it again this year.

And Republicans like Energy and Commerce ranking member Joe Barton (Texas) argue that the idea Democrats would try to move cap-and-trade in the depths of a recession is politically insane.

Markey has no illusions that the path ahead will be easy, but he said he’s convinced the goal is worthwhile and that he will ultimately be successful.

“It’s no longer something that can be bottled up like it was by the Bush administration,” he said. And he said that no one should be surprised by the way he is going about building support for the bill.

“That’s how I’ve been operating my whole career,” he said. “We’ve been doing this a long, long time.”

comments powered by Disqus




Want Roll Call on your doorstep?