Arizona: Shadegg Targeted by Coming FEC Complaint
Arizona Democrats are asking federal regulators to look into campaign contributions made to a political action committee run by Rep. John Shadegg (R).
Shadegg is named in a complaint brought by the Arizona Democratic Party that is expected to be filed with the Federal Election Commission today. In it, Democrats allege that Shaddegs campaign committee and his PAC may have colluded together to avoid the individual contribution limits to a federal candidate and in violation of several FEC regulations.
Last summer, the complaint alleges, Shadeggs re-election committee received two $4,600 payments the maximum combined amount an individual may give per cycle for both the primary and general elections from John Dawson and David Van Denburgh. Not soon after, the complaint continues, Dawson and Van Denburgh also each gave Shadeggs leadership PAC an additional $5,000 apiece, the maximum amount an individual may give to a federal PAC during a calendar year.
The problem? Within weeks, Shadeggs leadership PAC had transferred $10,000 to Shadeggs primary campaign account, a transaction Democrats claim was really designed to circumvent the individual contribution limits.
Democrats also allege that Dawson and Van Denburgh violated campaign finance laws by knowingly taking part in the scheme and claim Ian MacPherson, the treasurer for both committees, also violated federal law for glossing over the transaction.
The questionable propriety of these contributions should have been obvious to the campaigns treasurer, the complaint alleges. He is also the PACs treasurer, so he would be familiar with the campaign finance reports of both political committees.
Shadeggs office declined to comment on the complaint.
Matthew Murray
Taylor: Preventing Another Underwear Bomber
March 19, 4:09 p.m.
The intelligence community faces challenges daily. No example is more emblematic of the problems faced than the so-called underwear bomber of 2009. As threats emerge, the hunt for persons of interest must occur in a more reliable and efficient manner because the consequences of inaction can be catastrophic. Read Full Article










