The rallying cry Wednesday was, “Equal pay for women.” Today, it likely will be “Insurance companies: Play fair.” And in the next month it will probably be “Gay rights.”
By design or happenstance, Senate Democrats have been rolling out a passel of “red meat” legislation that appeals to the Democratic base in this pivotal election year.
With Republicans in the majority, they signaled to their base with issues favored by religious conservatives. Democrats, now in control, are pushing bills favored by gay groups, women’s organizations and labor unions while denouncing insurance companies.
Democratic leaders said it was more coincidence than plan that has led them to push during this work period a bill to make it easier for people to sue for wage discrimination, two measures attempting to ensure that insurance companies don’t discriminate on the basis of mental health or genetics, and legislation creating a federal hate crimes statute that includes sexual orientation.
“When we go home and people are really worried about their lives right now, we’re trying to respond with an agenda here on the floor that directly affects that,” said Senate Democratic Conference Secretary Patty Murray (Wash.), referencing the economy and rising food and gas prices. “Does that happen to be a host of issues our base cares about? Yeah, but that’s what people care about right now.”
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chairman Charles Schumer (N.Y.) said the presence of Democratic “meat and potato” issues on the floor is a result of Republicans’ attempts to block even noncontroversial bills from moving quickly through the chamber.
“We’ve more or less made a decision that, because they block everything, we might as well get our program out there,” Schumer said.
Labor unions and women’s groups are lobbying for the wage discrimination bill. Wednesday night’s vote failed to get the 60 votes needed to beat back a GOP-led filibuster, but Schumer said the debate was worthwhile from a policy and political perspective.
“It’s not just the Democratic base,” said Schumer of the bill’s appeal. “It’s a lot of swing voters – single women, older women who are in the workforce. … So I think it can have real ramifications” for the election.
Republicans said Democrats were holding the vote for crass political reasons, noting that Democrats have previously scheduled debates to coincide with left-leaning political rallies around the Capitol. Wednesday’s vote was partly held in recognition of the union-sponsored “Equal Pay Day” on Tuesday, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) kept the Senate out of session most of Wednesday to make sure that Democratic presidential contenders Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) and Barack Obama (Ill.) could attend the evening vote.
“We’re staging this for another political interest vote,” complained Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).
Serving up red meat during a heated election year is hardly the province of just Democrats. When Republicans were in control of the chamber in 2004 and 2006, the Senate held votes on conservative issues such as bans on flag burning and gay marriage. In those days, Democrats groused loudly about the political nature of those debates.
On January 3, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., raises her right hand as her son Henry messes up her hair while Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., delivers the ceremonial swearing-in in the Old Senate Chamber. Gillibrand's other son Theodore, lower right, looks on.
Each year since 1990, CQ Roll Call has reviewed the financial disclosures of all 541 senators, representatives and delegates to determine the 50 richest members of Congress. This year's report, derived from forms covering the calendar year 2012, shows it took a net worth of $6.67 million to crack the exclusive club.