- Rand Paul's 'Long Haul' Cut Short
- Bernie Sanders as GOP Tool: Their Plan to Use Him Against Democrats
- Can Rubio Follow Romneys Path to the Nomination?
- Why Was Fiorina Denied Ad Time During the Debate?
- What the Hell Happened to Jeb Bush?
After weeks of arguing over when the military will run out of money, House and Senate Republicans hope to up the rhetorical ante this week by formally calling on Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to bring the House back from a two-week spring recess to finish drafting the controversial $120 billion-plus Iraq War spending bill.
In a letter to be sent to Pelosi today, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), along with their top deputies, insist that the Speaker should “call the House back into session immediately” and criticize her for neglecting to take actions that would have allowed a House-Senate conference committee to begin work on the bill over the break. (The Senate took a one-week break and returns Tuesday.)
“We are especially troubled by the House’s failure to appoint conferees. The Senate appointed conferees on March 29, moments after passing its bill, but the House never did so despite passing the bill a week earlier,” the leaders write. “Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) told the Senate that he hoped the House-Senate conference would begin on March 30. ... That hoped-for progress has been thwarted by your failure to act.”
The letter is just the latest salvo in a war of words between Republicans and Democrats over when the supplemental actually will be needed, with Democrats insisting the Army could operate until summer without the additional money and Republicans claiming combat operations and military readiness would suffer if the bill is not approved by April 15 — a day before the House is scheduled to return.
Meanwhile, both versions of the Democrat-crafted bills have drawn veto threats from President Bush, primarily because they contain timelines for withdrawal from Iraq, with the House mandating an end to combat operations by August 2008 and the Senate setting a “goal” of having such operations halted by March.
Republicans have said they want Democrats to finish the conference on the bill quickly, so that once the president vetoes the measure, Congress still will have enough time to pass a “clean” funding bill.
Still, Senate Republicans do not have any way to force the House to come back, since they already agreed to the House’s two-week recess when they did not object to the March 29 passage of the House-Senate adjournment resolution, which sets the House’s return date as April 16. (The resolution does allow for an earlier assembly, but only if Reid and Pelosi agree on it.)
But Senate Republicans said their chief complaint is not that the House took two weeks off, but that they neglected to appoint conferees to the supplemental and that, simultaneously, Democratic leaders have been sending signals that they want to cut off funding for the troops.
“The House hasn’t appointed conferees and the Senate Democrat leader last week offered his support for legislation to halt troop funding. Congressional Democrats are either foot-dragging at best or purposefully delaying at worst, and Republicans are going to fight to get the funds to the front line,” said Ryan Loskarn, spokesman for Senate Republican Conference Chairman Jon Kyl (Ariz.).
Loskarn was referring to Reid’s announcement last week that he would co-sponsor a Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) bill that essentially would cut off funds for the Iraq War by March 31, 2008.