- Ratings Change: Kirk's Race Now Tilts to Democrats
- Congressional Hits and Misses: Best of Rob Bishop
- Carol Shea-Porter 'Ready to Win' N.H. Seat Back
- Lindsey Graham Rolls Eyes at Rand Paul
- Why Titus Won't Run for Reid's Senate Seat
The Center for Democracy & Technology has been fighting for almost 10 years to limit the impact of campaign finance laws on political speech online. The CDT was the initial advocate of the approach that Reps. Charles Bass (R-N.H.) and Tom Allen (D-Maine) have taken in H.R. 4900, an approach we believe offers far greater protection for Web loggers and individual speakers on the Internet than does H.R. 1606, introduced by Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas).
Although we appreciate the intention behind the Hensarling bill, that bill simultaneously does too little and too much.
It does too little because it addresses only the narrow question raised by the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act about the application of “public communications” rules to the Internet. At the same time, it completely ignores the regulation of the Internet that predated BCRA in the Federal Election Campaign Act.
Even if H.R. 1606 were enacted, bloggers and individual speakers on the Internet still would face burdensome requirements under FECA to (a) file reports on expenditures with the Federal Election Commission, (b) publicly post their home addresses when they advocate on behalf of a candidate, and (c) submit to onerous “political committee” regulation if two or more bloggers or speakers collaborate on a Web site. Moreover, H.R. 1606 is silent on whether the “media exemption” (the one that protects news outlets from regulation) can apply to bloggers and other online publications.
In sharp contrast, the bill by Bass and Allen addresses all of these points, and it makes crystal clear that 99 percent of bloggers and other individual speakers on the Internet will be free from all campaign finance regulation.
Most importantly, H.R. 4900 protects speakers in a simple manner that will allow individuals to determine if they are subject to regulation without hiring a lawyer to help them wade through more than 1,000 pages of statutes, regulations and “advisory opinions” promulgated by the FEC.
The Bass-Allen bill creates a broad “safe harbor” level of $5,000 in spending below which no regulations apply. Thus, bloggers and ordinary citizens who do not spend more than $5,000 a year on online political speech are exempted from campaign finance laws. Under H.R. 4900, all that a blogger or small online speaker would have to ask is: “Have I spent more than $5,000 this year?” If the answer is “no” — as it will be for 99 percent of bloggers and individuals on the Internet — then no campaign finance laws will apply.
In the view of the campaign finance reform community, the Hensarling bill also does too much. That bill would remove spending limitations imposed by BCRA on state political parties and corporations, permitting them to spend unlimited amounts of “soft money” on Internet advertising and other online advocacy. Because of the loopholes created by H.R. 1606, it is certain to face protracted opposition in the Senate from Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Russ Feingold (D-Wis.), among others.