Dec. 20, 2014 SIGN IN | REGISTER
Download CQ Roll Call's Definitive Guide to the 114th Congress | Sign Up for Roll Call Newsletters | Get the Latest on the Roll Call App

House Race Bloggers: So Little Knowledge, So Much Hot Air

After spending much of 2004 pummeling the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, liberal bloggers have now turned their keen analytical skills to 2006.

Contributors to two of the better known political blogs, Daily Kos and MyDD, seem to believe that they know more about House campaigns than do the professionals who have spent years actually working on races and running campaign committees.

The first rule of blogging apparently is All Opinions Are Equal, with Experience Doesnt Matter a close second.

Last cycle, Markos Moulitsas (whose Web bio does not mention any campaign experience) of Daily Kos promoted a number of Democratic House candidates, including Missouris Jim Newberry and Ohios Jeff Seeman and Ben Konop as good targets for fundraising assistance. Newberry drew 28 percent of the vote against Rep. Roy Blunt (R), while Seeman hauled in 33 percent against Rep. Ralph Regula (R). Konop topped the trio, taking 41 percent against Rep. Mike Oxley (R).

All three races were unwinnable from day one for the Democrats, so raising cash for those challengers was about as useful as flushing money down the toilet.

Blogger Chris Bowers at MyDD perhaps is the best example of how clueless some bloggers really are about politics.

Last summer, he penned a piece, DCCC Not Aggressive Enough, in which he complained about his partys House campaign committee. Now, in a two-part series called Taking Back the House, he insists we need to attack everywhere.

I want 80 serious challenges to GOP House incumbents every two years and a Democratic name on the ballot in all 435 districts, he demands. I have had enough of just targeting the twenty or so top races lets engage in a full-frontal assault. ... The first step is to identify eighty Republicans against who we could mount a serious challenge.

It is undeniably true that you cant defeat an incumbent if you dont run someone against him. So, yes, its better for a party to field candidates in 435 districts, if possible.

But some Republicans didnt have Democratic opponents because they were unbeatable, and no Democrat wanted to waste his or her time (to say nothing about money) by running. You cant make a race competitive simply by putting a name on the ballot, and the Democrats would not hold even a single additional seat had they put a name on the ballot in every district during the past two cycles.

As for Bowers assertion that he wants 80 serious challenges to GOP incumbents next year, he might as well ask for 120 or 150. I want vacation houses in Napa Valley and Palm Beach, and Id like to be 35 years old again. If wishes were horses, beggars might ride, as the English proverb puts it.

If Bowers had any historical perspective, he would know that there have been cycles when there were five or even 10 dozen competitive races, and where the DCCC showered money on second- and third-tier contests that it hoped would develop during a political wave.

comments powered by Disqus




Want Roll Call on your doorstep?