Frist-Allen Relationship Fraying?
Would-be White House Candidates Clash in Senate
Roll Call Staff
In a potential preview of what may become a more public fight between the duo for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination, Virginia Sen. George Allen has publicly questioned Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist’s (R-Tenn.) handling of three high-profile issues in recent weeks.
Allen was one of the leading voices in the call to invoke the so-called “nuclear,” or constitutional, option to eliminate filibusters on judicial nominees and has emerged as a critic of Frist’s approach to calling a vote.
In a trip to New Hampshire last weekend, more than a month after a compromise on judges had been reached, Allen said, “we should have gone for it earlier,” when asked about the timing of triggering the nuclear option.
The Virginia Senator has also been an aggressive advocate for John Bolton’s confirmation as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, and was critical of Frist’s decision last week to bring the nomination to the floor without the votes required to end debate.
“Having played quarterback, I always like to have everyone in formation when you are ready to run a play,” Allen said of the Bolton vote on MSNBC last week.
Allen and Frist also tussled — at the staff level — over a resolution sponsored by the Virginia Senator apologizing to black Americans for the lack of Senate action on lynchings.
“What Allen is doing with Frist right now is akin to midget wrestling,” said an adviser to one of the other would-be Republican presidential candidates. “No one that matters for 2008 is paying attention to those kinds of barbs and comments.”
Allen partisans insist that his recent outspokenness has nothing to do with either Frist or a possible national campaign.
“Allen would be doing this whether he was talked about for president or not,” said one source familiar with the Senator’s thinking. “It fits into his persona. He is very frustrated by process.”
Despite those assertions, sources friendly to Frist and even many neutral observers believe more is at work in Allen’s comments, particularly given that the issues the Virginian has picked to champion are touchstones for social conservatives who will be critical in the 2008 nominating process.
“These may be the opening set of skirmishes over who is the right candidate for” social conservatives, said one well-connected Republican consultant. “Frist is competing for that vote very hard.”
Frist carried the banner for Christian conservatives earlier this year when he led the push to allow a federal court to re-examine the case of Terri Schiavo, a brain-damaged Florida woman who was eventually removed from a feeding tube and died.
Most observers break the Republican presidential primary field into three basic constituencies: moderates, mainstream/establishment GOPers and movement conservatives.
Both Allen and Frist seem to fit most naturally into the mainstream model — fiscally and socially conservative but with a streak of pragmatism that separates them from the party’s ideological warriors on the right.
But, to win the Republican presidential nomination Frist or Allen need to reach into the bloc of socially conservative voters who make up a near-decisive portion of the primary electorate.
Social conservatives’ “votes are obviously important to anyone who wants to compete in the mainstream conservative primary,” remarked one party strategist.
Privately, Frist allies reject the idea that the two men are politically similar and fighting for the same piece of the primary pie.
“George Allen is football analogies and chewing tobacco. That is an image he has carefully cultivated over the years,” said a source supportive of Frist. “Bill Frist is doctor and AIDS in Africa. One is a career politician and one is a citizen legislator.”
Taylor: Preventing Another Underwear Bomber
March 19, 4:09 p.m.
The intelligence community faces challenges daily. No example is more emblematic of the problems faced than the so-called underwear bomber of 2009. As threats emerge, the hunt for “persons of interest” must occur in a more reliable and efficient manner because the consequences of inaction can be catastrophic. Read Full Article
Roll Call Video Channels
