CongressNow Overview: Health Care to Dominate Congressional Debate for Months

Related Content

• Chart: Bills and Hot Docs Related to Health Care
• Health Care: The Mother of All Policy Debates
• Baucus: Americans Are Demanding Action
• Waxman: Reform Key to Economic Recovery
• Blunt: GOP Already Taking Innovative Approach
• Harkin: Preventive Care Needs Emphasis
• Snowe: Reform Plan Should Tackle the Essentials
• Wyden and Bennett: Providers Must Focus On Patient Outcomes
• Burgess: Study What Policies Are Working
• Boustany: Controlling Costs Is Top Priority
• Dingell: Health Care Should Be a Right, Not a Privilege

Print

E-Mail

Reprints

Text Size

Latest News

• Lincoln’s Saturday Timing Puzzles Colleagues
• Senate Democrats Score Major Victory
• Republicans Continue to Challenge Health Bill
• Greg Ball Drops Out of New York Race
• Democrats Line Up 60 Votes to Start Debate

Correction Appended

Now, the real work begins.

President Barack Obama and Congressional leaders have had their summits and their stakeholder meetings. Now they are starting to debate the actual details of health care reform.

It’s a top priority not only for Obama, but in Congress and among industry groups and patient activists. With 47 million Americans uninsured and millions more with inadequate amounts of insurance, and with health care and entitlement costs spiraling out of control, there is nearly universal agreement that something needs to be done.

But how — and how much and how fast — remains a topic of dispute.

The Obama administration has aimed for passing health care reform by the end of the year, and both chambers of Congress are working toward that goal. Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) is planning to put the reform plan on the president’s desk during the summer. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chairman Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) is expected to have his language ready for a reform bill as early as Memorial Day.

Key House lawmakers, including Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), are working with the same timeline. Waxman and Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.), chairman of Energy and Commerce’s Subcommittee on Health, are aiming to begin drafting language in April, in order to be ready to conference with the Senate in August, a House Democratic aide said.

But hard work lies ahead. While Obama and Members of Congress have already held a number of summits and other meetings and issued white papers to establish the basic principles, there are no legislative details at this point.

It’s time to move beyond the “happy talk” that has characterized the discussions so far, said David Introcaso, vice president of health care research for the Marwood Group, which specializes in financial services.

The next few weeks are crucial to getting reform done this year, as language needs to be introduced and debated, he said.

Without such details, stakeholders are merely “at the first pitch of a nine-inning game,” said Elizabeth Hall, vice president for public policy at Wellpoint Inc., a health benefits company.

Among the largest fights will be one over a proposed public health care coverage plan. Republicans and industry groups have already drawn a line in the sand, pledging to oppose a public option on the grounds that it undermines the competitiveness of private plans.

Specifically, conservatives say the government cost controls inherent in a public plan will make it difficult for private insurers to compete.

“Human nature and common sense will tell you that if you’ve got a government program competing with private programs, all of the factors weigh in favor of the government program” and individuals will leave the private-sector plans as a result, said Rep. Nathan Deal (R-Ga.), the ranking member of the Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health.

This is a “flash point” in the debate between the sides, a House GOP aide said. The issue is a potential deal-killer, Introcaso said.

While some stakeholders, including John Arensmeyer, the chief executive officer of the Small Business Majority, believe that compromise on the issue is possible, others doubt it.

It is “virtually impossible to guarantee fair competition because government can change the rules of the game at any time,” a House GOP aide said.

Another Republican insider showed his contempt for the proposal by likening a public option to a shark attack.

“Does the comely swimmer compete fairly, or at all, with the peckish shark? To be fair, the White House probably will start by proposing to eat only the lady’s foot,” the aide said. “People on the beach would then be expected to congratulate her on getting a compromise and wonder what the bloody thrashing was all about.”